The 2021 NFL Draft – 4 days away!

Once again I stress . . . Quality over quantity. We had plenty of draft capital last year and will continue to have added capital next season and beyond. The important thing, most paramount, is to find players that help this team NOW. I’d rather have 3 or 4 great players in this draft rather than acquiring more picks and lesser talent. We’re close Dolphins fans, I know some of you don’t feel that way but I believe we’re close to being legitimate contenders. Rumors are hot that we may trade up from #18 and I’m fine with that. I’m not worried about who is available at #6, there will be a player there who will help our team, whether it’s Chase, Pitts, Sewell or even Smith.

To me, our greatest needs are WR, pass rusher, RB and center. Those are my 4 top positions. You may feel differently, but that’s how I see it. If we do trade up from #18 I think the chance of drafting Najee Harris goes away, but getting Jovonte Williams later on sure would be a nice consolation. It also may hurt the chances of us getting one of the top centers in the draft, like Creed Humphrey, Landon Dickerson, Josh Myers or Quinn Meinerz. I think we can get one no matter what, we may just lose our choice of which one. I know we have Michael Deiter, but if we had any intentions of having him play C, we don’t pick up Matt Skura. I do think C is a priority.

I think on defense, adding Benardrick McKinney added another rangy tackler. #55 is all over the field making tackles, now he’ll have help with McKinney. AVG grew quite a bit last season, he was very productive, but will additional snaps add to his production or wear him down? Can Vince Biegel become what AVG was last season? I think we will be looking for help early in this draft, as early #18 or even earlier if we trade up.

We’re going to do another FMU Consensus Mock Draft, stay tuned for when it will occur, I would like to have maximum participation. Last year, the crew here was pretty darn accurate, it was pretty impressive! We went 10 for 10 on the first 10 picks, the Jets of course ruined our accuracy. Even if you don’t post often or have never posted here, please join us and watch for the Mock Draft date coming very soon!

GO DOLPHINS!!!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

699 Responses to The 2021 NFL Draft – 4 days away!

  1. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    On this day in 1983 the Miami Dolphins draft Dan Marino

  2. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Another thing we may not be aware of is Austin Jackson said he played both right and left side in college at tackle and has no problem with either side. You draft Sewell and let it play out. Now you have two young prototypes on either side. Who cares other than money down the line. If you’re dominant at your job you’ll get paid. Interior OL Joe Thuney just got a $80M contract in FA. We don’t have to worry about that for 3-4 years with any of our guys.

    When they say you build around your young potential franchise QB, it doesn’t mean just weapons to get the ball to, it means allowing him the time to do so. If you can’t block plays it doesn’t matter how great the skill guys are. We just watched that in the Super Bowl.

  3. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Appreciation post

  4. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Tim,
    I’ve been saying that about OL and where they play for years. I do think some guys are just naturally better fits for one side or another. Physically, some dudes just have a hard time with L/R, but I think it’s very few.
    ***
    In the old days…ya know 20 years ago or so….the specific job of each OL positions was different. RG and RT were run guys because teams typically lined up their TE on the right side and ran to the power side. LG was a puller, so he could get to the power side. Nowadays with how NFL teams run their offenses, we’re seeing less of that specificity. I said a few weeks ago that I’ve had to change the way I evaluate players now, and it started with how I looked at OL. Things are just different these days. Every damn guy needs to be athletic and be able to move well. As an OT you need to be able to pass pro against great rush guys on either side, and we’re starting to see the money shift too. It’s not just LTs who are getting paid.

  5. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Najee had some of the same benefits as Zach Wilson.

    Both played against a lot of lessor opponents at a team level.

    RBs on the Colts with Manning had some off the same benefits Najee had, in that the passing games were so good it opened up the run, add Bama’s line to that and you get Najee’s stats.

    Not saying he isn’t worry, just that his stats like the others mentioned above are inflated.

    If we take him in the 1st you won’t hear one negative word from me, I just think we can get better value from Williams at 36.

    Two things that put Najee at the head of the class are his pass catching/blocking skills

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      When did the SEC become lesser competition?

      • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

        Bama’s O steam rolled everyone.

        7 of 13 games over 50 pts, 31 and 38 only games under 40.

        Not much competition between the Bama O and any D they faced

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        As opposed to everyone else?

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        The SEC is as close to the pros as you can get. Doesn’t mean you have to draft there, but it matters. Is it just me or does Alabama and LSU etc. send prospects to the NFL every friggin year?

  6. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    If Trey Lance & Justin Fields are both there at 6, we should take one of them,

  7. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    R1P9: Waddle,
    R1P18: Jalean Phillips
    R2P4: Creed Humphry
    R2P18: Javonte Williams
    R3P18: Alim McNeill, DT, NCST
    pick 114 from denver Walker Little T
    pick 132 from cleve Dazz Newsome
    ________________________________

    Miami also gets Denver 22 first rnder

  8. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    i think pitts and chase will both be gone at 6,

    if that’s the case, what do we do?

  9. David Collins's avatar David Collins says:

    Orob, just curious as to why You hate Grier,

    but alot of right wingers hate minorities, , especially if the minority is much more intelligent than the hater
    i sincerely hope you arent in that category

  10. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    David, did you really shit in a macy’s dressing room?

  11. David Collins's avatar David Collins says:

    im thinking if orob were the GM in Marinos rookie season, he would have traded him to the jets after his first start, he had three ints, unacceptable for a rookie qb, lol

    Marino didnt make the HOF in his rookie season, but he made it

  12. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    Lol. Even Skip isnt convinced about the point he’s making in that video.

  13. David Collins's avatar David Collins says:

    John Elway, was a HOF QB AND super bowl champion,
    but his rookie season he was the 26th rated QB , with an putrid passer rating of 54.4

    shoud he have been traded away after a horrible rookie season? the broncs knew to be more patient on him, and it worked out well for them

  14. David Collins's avatar David Collins says:

    Tom Brady, who many claim is the best QB of all time, is a hall of famer with many SB championships

    his rookie season stats, he completed 33 percent , for a 42.4 rating, hardly the stats of even a starting QB

  15. New Age's avatar New Age says:

    Guys, what time is the draft tonight? I’ll try to be on but I’m pretty packed until 8 EST.

    Tim,

    On WRs, players like Prescott instantly got better after getting a top WR. Players like Red Rocket also saw far greater success when their elite WR was on the field. Even with the changes to the game, a top RB is too dependent on a great OL for results in comparison. Even Henry can be shut down fairly easily by a good defense and has been the past two years. Just get a solid lead, and the stud RB on the other team suddenly doesn’t matter much. The WRs matter a lot more in those instances and never really lose their value based off the OL.

  16. Rhino's avatar Rhino says:

    MF13, thanks for posting the Najee episode! Just finished it (wasn’t online last night).

    This was an angle about the transition to the pros that doesn’t seem to be considered too much: the stress of the non-football things. Also shows the maturity that is important because without it the money and fame can undermine the focus of an immature 22 year old.

    The last episode they mentioned the mentoring of Lynch, so it was cool to see how they focused the last 6+ minutes on that on-going relationship. Last line: “wherever I go, just get this over with and get this shit started”. lol I could feel his ‘drive’ throughout the episode. If he isn’t worth a first round pick, then the NFL should just ban RBs from the first round as a rule. LOL. Whether or not Miami gets him, someone will take him in the first round and it terrifies me to think it will be a team in our division (or conference).

  17. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Najee is Daniel Thomas 2

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      He very well could be, that’s why I’m not drafting him in the 1st.

      He could also be a version of Henry, that isn’t quite as brutal to DBs, but more agile and better all around.

      If teams think he was close to Henry he’ll go mid-first.

      For me to be a 1st rounders you better be someone that can take over a game, he’s not that like Barkley and Zeke

      • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

        Guys like Henry, and Jim Brown ran over people, so their upright running style worked.

        Erick Dickerson at 6’3″ had a different style, he was more elusive and great at reading holes.

        Think Najee is somewhere in between the tall bruisers and the tall elusive backs.

        Tweeners seem to have trouble in the NFL, if they aren’t great at something running the ball.

        This might be the case with Najee, he could be another Drake, but a little better between the tackles, or a little better Malcolm Brown

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      You are just asking the Dolphins to disappoint you at this point…

      • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

        Or he’s thinking realistically.

        None of these draftees are free of the bust label.

        OTs seem to be the safest lately, but there’s been your Robert Galleries and Tony Mandarich’s

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        I don’t think proclaiming some one is a bust already and saying the possibility of some one being a bust are the same thing

  18. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    The Skip comments above from his video are very similar to what was said about Brees after SD selected Rivers.

    It’s not meant to be more than opinion, but the opinion is, if you’re unsure about your QB you should give him some competition.

    Just a different point of view, both opinions, the one for drafting another and keeping Tua each have their positives.

    I’d take the playmaker this year, but I can see why some would draft a QB at 6.

    People get so narrow-minded with what they think is right, that they don’t consider the other sides POV

  19. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Discuss

    6: R1 P6 WR Ja’Marr Chase – LSU
    18: R1 P18 EDGE Azeez Ojulari – Georgia
    36: R2 P4 EDGE Joseph Ossai – Texas
    50: R2 P18 RB Najee Harris – Alabama
    81: R3 P17 DL Alim McNeill – NC State
    156: R5 P12 C Drake Jackson – Kentucky
    231: R7 P3 OT Alaric Jackson – Iowa
    258: R7 P30 TE Nick Eubanks – Michigan

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      I hate Ojulari in the 1st, too much of a project in how we’d use him.

      IMO Ossai is a reach too.

      Najee at 50 is a steal, but very slim chance he’s there

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        Your draft board must stop at about a dozen players….lol

        The players at 18-40 are all about the same. None of the players can escape the “reach” label

        That might be the benefit of trading down and then trading up from 2B or 3rd round later

        If you can have 4 players in that 2nd round range, but you have to take one in the first round, that’s a heck of a draft

        When we get to 18, unless parsons is still on the board, everyone will feel like a reach

  20. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    If we know one thing about our FO, it’s that they don’t put all their eggs in 1 basket.

    Drafting Najee in the first would kind of go against that thinking.

    They traded back to 6, because they believe the guy at 6 and an additional 1st was better than the pick at 3.

    They didn’t trade up to get Tua last year.

    Minimize the risk by giving yourself more options.

    A trade down from 18 might be enough for them to select Najee at the end of the first

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      Any way you look at 18 it always feels like a bit of a reach

      I feel like Harris is the safest pick there to be honest

      The one player I see there usually that I also feel like is a good playing is Barmore, but I’m not sure we will look DL early

      If we end up trading down, I still think Harris might be the pick with the next pick. Whatever we acquire might help us move up from the 3rd round or in the 2nd to address other positions

  21. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Highly attainable draft wants

    Pitts/Chase only with pick 6 or trade down to get Smith/Waddle/Parsons/Penei

    18 with a receiver already drafted Parsons/Owusu, or if Parsons with pick 1 take a receiver, or trade down to get 1 of top 3 needs

    36 with receiver and Edge drafted get RB, if one of the 3 positions not drafted yet get it

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      I’d also be OK with Treven Jenkins at 18.

      Any of these 3 combos would be great without trades:
      Pitts/Chase
      Jenkins/Parsons/Owusu
      Najee/Williams

      With trades any of these 3:
      Waddle/Smith/Parsons/Jenkins/Najee/Rousseau/Owusu/Williams

  22. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Guys like Ojulari, Paye, and some other Edge guys are too much of a risk in the first.

  23. New Age's avatar New Age says:

    Piggy thanks for reminding me it’s just Tuesday lol.

    Steve, I think people narrow their POV because some ideas seem incredibly nonsensical. We just drafted a QB at 5 and he hasn’t even had a full year of experience. So you use a #6 the very next year for competition? That sounds either trolly or stupid to me, just being honest.

    Why did you bring in the experienced Brisset if you wanted your competition between a rookie and 2nd year guy? Who wastes draft picks like that? Two top 10 picks for QB? It shows you’re terrible at evaluation and what GM wants to advertise that to the owner? Any owner since you will be looking for another job soon?

    Thinking outside the box is fine but there should be logical reasoning involved especially if. I one has ever done it. I’d feel like the fool I was if I left Chase or Pitts for #7 because I wanted ‘competition’ for Tua. It makes zero sense but maybe someone can explain it without saying Tua was a mistake? Any takers?

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      I’m there with you, but there’s the group, that says you keep taking a QB until you find your guy.

      I can’t say I blame them.

      Do you want to give Tua 3 or 4 years? Some say no

      Flores seems to have found his guy, the media has other thoughts

  24. Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

  25. New Age's avatar New Age says:

    Steve,

    I used to consider that thought process and liked it. But then I noticed no employed GM ever does that and ex-GM talking heads didn’t when they were employed decision makers. I’m not saying Tua will be great and ORob might be right about him. I’m saying no GM will ever risk his job that way. It’s too good of a gig, too big of a risk. If the guy is average at best, do like Cincy, Dallas, etc and surround him with as much talent as possible to offset your mistake lol.

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      I never liked it, even though you could say it worked for SD, depending on if you’d rather have Brees or Rivers

  26. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    So Kindley goes to his natural position of LG, wonder if a tell has come out and maybe we’re now looking at Penei?

    Jenkins makes a lot more sense at 18 now or even Vera-Tucker

  27. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    I don’t really trust Beasley but this is what he’s saying

  28. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

  29. CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

    LOL, the only one of the top players I figured we had very little chance of selecting if there was Sewell, and now the Fins have made that a real possibility too.

    So right now we legitimately could be taking at #6 – Pitts, Chase, Parsons, or Sewell…or we could be trading down and possibly still getting one of those guys or Smith, Waddle, or someone else. I love this regime.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      So basically we don’t know anything

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      Yeah, lots of options, and not afraid to trade down.

      There’s several good OTs in this draft, but how many can play RT, besides Sewell and Jenkins?

      Jenkins at 18 would be my hope, if they really are going to select an OT, but when do we select Edge and RB?

      We could, just have comp between Fluker, Hunt and Davis, but if Hunt is really being pushed to OG, then Davis or Fluker

  30. CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

    So did trading Flowers save us 9 mil?

  31. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    With Flowers traded Sewell has to be one of our top choices.
    Lock it down as we take Pitts, Chase or Sewell at #6 unless trade down for crazy QB money.

  32. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    I love it when a plan comes together.

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      The plan that everyone in the organization shuts the f up, and doesn’t let anyone one in on who we’re picking?

  33. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    5 QBs, 4 receivers, 4 OTs including Teven, 3 CBS, and 2 OLBs.

    That’s 18 we can get 2.

  34. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Can you imagine if we take some one like Jenkins at 18

    And then take a center on the late 2nd or 3rd round
    and then our line ends up being

    Jackson, Kindley, R1, Hunt, R2

    And Hen we basically rebuilt the OL in 2 years

  35. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

  36. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    To go with the OL Pitts, Chase, Smith or Waddle and Najee or Williams.

    The O would be set

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      Yeah but that means no defense in the draft

      I think it’s possible but if we are talking OL, a RB and a weapon there doesn’t leave much room for a pass rusher

      • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

        Correct, C might get pushed back to 81, RB to 50, and take an Edge at 36.

        With Teven we may not need a top RB this year, we could wait a year

  37. bookman11's avatar bookman11 says:

    The Flying Pig says:
    April 27, 2021 at 12:14 pm
    So basically we don’t know anything

    LMAO!

  38. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    This will infuriate the defensive minded guys but what if it falls like:

    6. Pitts
    18. OT Jenkins
    36. RB Williams
    50: OC Humphrey
    3rd round pick: WR Tylan Wallace or Amon St Brown

    That’s gonna give defenses headaches

  39. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Where have we heard this before?

    It’s weird to say, but I really don’t think the Dolphins can screw up the 1st round SBNation

    I understand that some of your brains might not be firing when you read this headline. The words weird to say, but I don’t think the Dolphins can screw up consecutively, which is not something that many of us have seen nor thought about before.

    It’s like preparing so well for a test, that all you can do is ace it.

    Our FO has put us in position to have a successful draft

  40. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Get a top 4 at receiver, OT, RB, OC or Edge.

    Get 4 of these and we’ll be ready to win a playoff game

  41. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    From PFF’s mock draft

    6. DENVER BRONCOS (VIA MIAMI, VIA PHILADELPHIA): QB TREY LANCE, NDSU
    Dolphins receive No. 9, No. 71 and a 2022 first-round pick
    Broncos receive No. 6 and No. 156

    The Broncos have a tough decision with three quarterbacks already off the board, but they shoot up for North Dakota State’s Trey Lance. The roster is too good to waste on another year of Drew Lock. Lance needs to figure out his accuracy but has every trait required to play quarterback at the highest level.

    — Seth Galina

    9. MIAMI DOLPHINS: WR JAYLEN WADDLE, ALABAMA
    Dolphins receive No. 9, No. 71 and a 2022 first-round pick
    Broncos receive No. 6 and No. 156

    As a result of their three trades, the Dolphins netted two future first-rounders from San Francisco, two third-rounders (one this year and one next year) and exchanged their first-rounder in 2022 for Denver’s (which is likely to be better). They gave up the third pick in the draft, which meant less to them than it did San Fran and the 123rd pick. Not too shabby.

    Oh, and they get who many believe to be the best wide receiver in the draft in Jaylen Waddle, who is reunited with former teammate Tua Tagovailoa. They will likely have to improve to keep the same-ish record as they had in 2020 due to all of the turnovers they generated defensively, but they are well on their way to doing so with the sharp moves they’ve made.

    — Eric Eager

    I don’t like that we wind up with Waddle waddle, but that is because of the Alabama stink.

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      Waddle’s NFL comparison is Tyreek Hill.

      Not quite as fast, but
      taller and bigger, and every bit as dynamic and plays the slot or outside.

      Sign me up right now for that trade and Waddle at 9

  42. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    The Dolphins are entertaining the idea of moving 2020 second-round pick Robert Hunt from starting right tackle to guard and signing a right tackle in free agency, sources told ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler. Solomon Kindley, the Dolphins’ 2020 fourth-round pick, received significant playing time as a rookie and returns as a capable starting guard option along with recent free-agent signing D.J. Fluker.

    We may sign an OT in FA, if we don’t draft one

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Seems that post would make more sense if sent out 3 months ago. I’m smelling Dolphins smoke. Won’t matter if we take Sewell, but otherwise will be in the OT draft hunt after.

  43. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    When you get traded for a swap of late round draft picks….. pretty much means you were worth your salary but not much more. But if your services are worth $10 mil a year that’s not too bad.

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      Salary and cap space.

      He was expendable, so the trade works.

      Since he was an FA, we paid only cap space and money

  44. New Age's avatar New Age says:

    It’s weird to say, but losing Flowers changed my thought process a lot. It says we weren’t confident in any of our RT options previously on the team. That makes Sewell and the other OTs more valuable to me.

    The OT FA market is pretty terrible at this point. Might as well draft a long term solution. I would pick Pitts if available but even Chase has close equivalents that makes me want OT more than WR. Sewell has climbed to option #2 when he was once at best #3. Just my thoughts.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      They could still set up with Davis/Fluker, but have a feeling they won’t. Doesn’t mean OT at #6 though.

  45. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I liked Flowers but he was making too much, especially since we have guys on the roster to replace him

  46. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    New Age – there are a couple of tackles worthy after Sewell. Slater, Darrisaw and Jenkins

  47. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    take sewell at 6, Slater at 18

  48. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    OK caught up, so we trade Flowers to the WFT, now they move Hunt to RG, move Kindley to LG, Jackson at LT, Creed Humphries at C and Sewell at RT.

    does that sound about right?

  49. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Didn’t we get Flowers from the WFT?

  50. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Good, no candy early

  51. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    6: R1 P6 TE Kyle Pitts – Florida
    18: R1 P18 LB Micah Parsons – Penn State
    36: R2 P4 OT Teven Jenkins – Oklahoma State
    50: R2 P18 RB Javonte Williams – North Carolina
    81: R3 P17 WR Amon-Ra St. Brown – USC
    156: R5 P12 DL Tyler Shelvin – LSU
    231: R7 P3 C Trey Hill – Georgia
    258: R7 P30 EDGE Jamar Watson – Kentucky

  52. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Not sure trading Flowers means we now draft OL more than it was always a possibility. I think it means the young guys already on the team will be starting. Kindley at LG and Hunt at RG.

  53. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    I don’t get the thinking that trading away one of our guards will make other teams think we are going to draft an OT.

  54. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Me trying to settle my nerves before the draft

  55. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Okay so now ORob is a Najee Harris hater with negative comparisons. And the list goes on…

  56. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    we still have either Deiter or Davis who can play LG, we just got DJ Fluker who can be plugged in at RG Hunt at RT, i’m sure Kindley will land one of the G spots.

    it may not be necessary to draft OL early.

  57. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Cameron Wolfe
    @CameronWolfe
    ·
    44m
    7th round pick swap will complete Ereck Flowers deal. Miami gets 244, sends out 258.

    Clear Miami wanted to move on from FA mistake in Flowers. High gtd $$ made it hard to move him so they had to pay $6M of $9M to get free of rest.

    Maybe we only save 2m

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      That’s it

      A swap of the 7th rounders!

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Well that makes it sound not as cool. We’re paying them to take him. Washington just ponies up $3 million, which basically becomes what we could have paid to have him play for us versus the trade.

      They wanted Flowers gone.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        They found rookies last year they are satisfied with to replace him.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        What rookies? Jackson, Kindley and Hunt were already starting.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Hunt wasn’t starting right away until Flowers got hurt and Kindley moved to LG. Hunt play some RT and RG. During the offseason we talked about an OL starting lineup without Flowers. The coaches feel good about last year’s rookies so Flowers was no longer needed. He was a stopgap just like Van Noy was on defense.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        I at least never had a doubt that all 3 would be starting in the opening game this year. And just above you said they are satisfied with the rookies. Are they or not?

  58. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    We were already talking about Jackson moving to RT if we draft Sewell before the Flowers trade. So drafting an OT has nothing to do with Flowers. It’s always been an option.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      At least makes it even more clear that was always an option. They just created a hole on the OL on purpose.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        No they drafted Kindley and Hunt last year and Hunt looks to be moving to RG and Kindley to LG where he played when Flowers got hurt. This team goes young when they can.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        And if Hunt goes to G….. we have a hole. Unless it is Davis or Fluker, but they are not long-term.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Davis played at RT more than Hunt did last year. The team likes Davis because he can play every position and can start.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        Will bet you we take either a T or a G in draft. And talking first 4 picks. That’s what changed with the Flowers trade.

    • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

      Continuing from last evening… but if we draft Sewell (a once-in-a-generation talent who has at least played RT before), why would we move the lesser in Jackson to protect Tua’s blindside? Seems like a waste to have Sewell play LT for our southpaw QB, does it not?

      Try to convince me that THAT would be a wise move, man.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        They’ll figure it out who plays where. Jackson played both left and right OT and guard in college. I posted an article of him saying that last night. He also said he doesn’t have that kind of ego that he must play left side. He’s also still very young at 21 years old. It’s not like he’s been playing one position for many years and now he’d have to make that switch. Jackson has a big upside. We’ll see how they go about it.

      • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

        Fair enough. The coaches will render their decisions as they see fit.

  59. Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

    I’m stumped… truly stumped. I feel like Maul in “The Clone Wars, Season 7”, where I KNOW something big is going to happen shortly (Order 66), but not knowing who, what, where, when, or how. Feel like we’re going to be movers — up and down the boards — during the Draft.

    Only thing I truly feel in my bones? We’re going to come away with Najee Harris. No, not because I love him that much (I do), but because he’s instant Offense for us (running, blocking, and receiving), and he and Tua are tighter than tight.

  60. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Dolphins running back Myles Gaskin averaged more yards running off the right side this season (5.9 yards per carry) than any other gap according to the charting of Pro Football Focus. Ahmed averages 6.1 per carry working off the right side to the perimeter. And Hunt has tallied 566 snaps at right tackle this season (with an addition 10 as an extra right end). The past month has seen a dramatic uptick in his play and, as a result, a dramatic uptick in the Dolphins’ ability to run the football. Miami as a team has rushed for 104, 110, 80 and 250 yards in their last four contests; nearly matching the number of 100 yard rushing performances the team crafted in their prior ten games this season (4).

    If Robert Hunt is the straw that stirs the run game drink, then the Las Vegas Raiders better come prepared on Saturday — because odds are we’ll see the Dolphins continuing to see how much they can push their rookie right tackle into pushing the ground game to new heights.

    Share on FacebookTweetShare on WhatsappShare by Email

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      We don’t really know they want to move Hunt inside. Why taking a G is possible too.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Hunt also came in a lot as a 6th OL and even tackle eligible where he forgot to report twice calling back two TDs. Rookie mistake. I believe he and Kindley both did that on the same play with that kicker/punter play we’ve run a few times.

  61. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Remember too that Jackson missed a few games last year with a foot injury so the OL did quite a bit of shuffling last year. Most teams deal with that every year.

    Stanger, not sure what you’re questioning me on. I’ve been saying because the coaches are happy with last year’s rookie class on the OL, Flowers was expendable. I don’t think that changes anything as far as adding a tackle in this year’s draft. I thought that was always an option with Flowers still here.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      And I completely agree with that. Was trying to point out with the Flowers cut we are more likely to go OL cause we have a hole. That’s it. Whole football world is talking about us maybe taking Sewell now after all.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Yeah because they don’t seem to know how things went on the OL last year. It just gives them new stuff to talk about. I’ve been mentioning tackle could be 1st round all offseason. I’ve said many times that RT Teven Jenkins could be our pick at #18. We do that and Hunt is likely moved permanently to guard. Nothing has changed for me.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        Thought Flores and Grier hid their plan well on this, but not from you. Well done! They take Jenkins and will be a call for the ages.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        I just don’t think Flowers had anything to with us drafting a tackle. Sewell could be the pick at #6 or someone other than Jenkins as well – Rashawn Slater, Christian Darrisaw or Alijah Vera-Tucker who is considered a guard at the next level due to short arms for tackle. If we drafted him at #18 Hunt might be our RT. Lots of options. Maybe even 2nd or 3rd round. We also have Fluker in the mix now.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        You are all over it Tim. To me cutting Flowers meant Hunt is moving inside. Otherwise you have Flowers, Kindley and Hunt at guard with 2 spots. Just sorta of simple musical chairs math on that. And if Hunt stays at RT you don’t need a T.

  62. Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

    Who started this whole narrative that Tua won’t be able to succeed with our Dolphins, unless we surround him with his college WRs (or the like)? That’s right, the MEDIA.

    Quite honestly, Tua was probably at 50% for us last year [less than a year removed from a career-threatening injury, no offseason, no camp, no strength-training (COVID year)… being he was REHABBING!].

    Albert Wilson and Allen Hurns opted-out (COVID), and by the time Tua was starting for us, the injury bug was beginning to hit our WR corps… and Tua went 6-3, despite it all.

    Throughout it all, we ALMOST made the playoffs (playoffs???)!

    The biggest possible smokescreen that’s been created? That we need to draft a receiver with our first pick in order to help the ‘wanna-be pro’ in Tua: I’m no longer buying it! Tua did VERY well, in lieu of his/our circumstances last year. Imagine him at 100% this year! We’ve got a decent WR corps, believe it or not.

    I’m no longer sure we’re seeking a WR with our first pick. And that we dropped one pick behind Cincy (who could very well take Penei Sewell before us), I don’t think Penei is our target, either.

    We’ve got a Defensive-minded HC, came from the Patsies*, and the Patsies* have always valued their LBs more than anything else throughout the Belicheat* era (minus Tom Lady*, of course).

    I now truly believe we’re targeting MICAH PARSONS

    And if we trade down from R1P6 (looking at the Broncos @ R1P9… hopefully there’s still a QB on the board they covet), we’ll acquire additional resources to get our targeted players.

    JMO

    • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

      DON’T KNOW if we can acquire Jerry Jeudy in the process, but it’s worth a shot.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I agree with you on Tua. That’s typical offense is more sexy talk. Not so sure about your Jerry Jeudy trade scenario but it’s interesting and out of the box thinking.

      • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

        I appreciate it, THANK YOU!

        Even if we can’t pry Jeudy away from the Broncos, we could still get their R2P8. Man, that pick would come in VERY handy for us this year.

  63. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    This is what is so cool about having two 1’s and two 2’s. So many options.

    • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

      Don’t you EVER tell me “sorry” when you just educated me! I THANK YOU for that, Rockphin, truly! 😀

      I will NEVER take offense to one who makes me smarter or wiser. #Respect, Rockphin!

  64. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    This team has undying love for Davis, you guys refuse to see it, with Flowers we had 6 starters now we have 5 and Flukah. Kindley is just getting started he’ll be a great LG.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Davis as a starter is an option. Think a less likely one though.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Who knows Fluker might be viewed as a RG with Hunt at RT. I think I remember when Fluker was drafted that they said he’d be better playing in a phone booth rather than on the outside. I think it’s pretty obvious that OL has been a priority for the Grier/Flores regime and won’t be surprised if that continues. I also agree with you on Davis, he’s more valuable to the team than he is to most fans.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      Who are you calling Flukah?!?!

      That not nice

  65. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    I’d leave Kindley at RG and put Hunt at LG. Guards are becoming a little more interchangeable these days, but I think Hunt probably has a bit more mobility than Kindley. Fluker gives you options. They may still see Hunt as a RT and picked up Fluker to fill in for Flowers.
    ***
    Haven’t I been saying this shit for months if they draft an OT early?

    • son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

      That’s Fine but Kindley is getting into NFL shape now so who knows but he’s gonna be really good on whatever side he gets.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I just said something very similar right above your post. I don’t get into which sides guys play on too much because the coaches will decide that based on what they think guys can and can’t do working with them in practice. I just want to see a solid starting 5. I think we have solid depth but need starters to take it to another level.

  66. Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

    In light of Flowers being shipped out to the Washington Football Team (<– still feels strange to say that!), I'm not sure it's indicative of us drafting an OT.

    • son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

      I maintain we walk away with Smith and Harris. In no particular order.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Not surprised you think that all because you were saying Flowers could be cut. You were basically right about moving on from him, just not an outright cut.

      • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

        You remembered! It was never about Flowers’ play, is was always about his exuberant contract.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        You were right. If the OL rookie class from last year didn’t impress the coaches, Flowers would still be here. But the plan to go young when we can seems to be trending nicely. 🙂

      • pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

        His contract was overtly and excessively happy?

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Indicative of drafting OL it is. Doesn’t mean it actually happens though. Son might be right that Davis is the guy to take his place.

  67. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    I leave you with my final Mock of the season

    Team Picks
    6: R1 P6 TE Kyle Pitts – Florida
    18: R1 P18 LB Micah Parsons – Penn State
    47: R2 P15 LB Joseph Ossai – Texas
    50: R2 P18 DL Daviyon Nixon – Iowa
    77: R3 P13 RB Javonte Williams – North Carolina
    81: R3 P17 C Josh Myers – Ohio State
    156: R5 P12 WR Ihmir Smith-Marsette – Iowa
    231: R7 P3 FB Ben Mason – Michigan
    244: R7 P16 P Max Duffy – Kentucky
    Trades
    Trade Partner: LA Chargers
    Sent:
    Round 2 Pick 4
    Received:
    Round 2 Pick 15
    Round 3 Pick 13

  68. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    I’m a fan of Najee Harris as most of you know but I also really like Javonte Williams as well. Travis Etienne is also a quality RB prospect.

    It’s kind of weird, the consensus is Najee Harris is perfect for the Steelers at #24 but it would be too early for us at #18. I’m not buying that at all.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I don’t think the Steelers re going to draft a RB I’m the first

      This is the same team that had no problem letting Bell sit out a year bs they didn’t want to pay him. They will probably wait until the 2nd round

  69. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Let’s have Czonka announce all our picks this year

  70. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    son,
    Well, they plugged Kindley in at RG last year, so I’m not so sure why everyone is thinking he’s a LG in the NFL….maybe it was because they had Flowers at LG….I don’t know. He looked pretty immobile last year. Maybe he gets in better shape, drops a few pounds and better at movement skills. I’d imagine, if they really are looking at Hunt as a guard now that they work it out in practice. I don’t care who plays where. Start the best 5, but It’d be nice if we had a set five and stopped moving guys around. It helps to learn the tendencies of the guys playing next to you.

    • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

      Gel-time… MOST important for any O-Line. Start the best 5 and get it on.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Kindley moved to LG when Flowers went down. They were all cross-trained like every team has to do because injuries happen. I’m just glad that we have young OL talent that looks promising and would not be surprised at all if we continue that to build around last year’s #5 QB. Great weapons are wants, protection is have-to-have.

  71. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    The Steelers need serious OL help.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Agreed.

    • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

      If they want to continue their tradition of SMASHMOUTH football, yes, they do. But if the idea is to get the ball out in under 2.x seconds (that’s where the game IS trending), not so much.

      Najee Harris could very easily be their first target as an outlet option for Big Ben.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      That was good stuff, man. It shows you how size and talent is good, but technique and chemistry is huge. The thing about Hunt and Kindley is they are naturally big, strong guys. When they become better football players and improve their conditioning, they could become dominant.

      Kindley is not slow physically by the way, I think it’s sometimes mentally not reading the play fast enough. These two guys are promising along with Jackson. We threw them in the fire to speed up the process along with Tua. That was good stuff by the coaching staff. Young players are supposed to get better. Get them started early so you know what you have and get them ready to all take the next step.

      Go Phins!!!

  72. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    Yeay Team!

    Ultimate highlights 2020

    Gesicki’s name called a lot. Still think Goedert is the better all around guy. LOL

  73. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Tim,
    Yeah, I thought Kindley looked okay at LG in the run game after Flowers went down….not so great at pass pro. I know folks think it’s his “natural position”, and it may be his most comfortable position. Like I said, they’ll figure out all this in practice. Hunt and Kindley can play both guard spots, I think.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Watch the video Rock posted. It focuses on the pros and cons of Kindley and Hunt. They’re both big, strong guys who have the physicality to play in the NFL, it’s now about improving their technique and becoming more seasoned with dissecting what the defense is doing. I’m excited to see last year’s rookie class overall in year two.

  74. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    I think we can all agree on this. In this draft we need to come away with a playmaker on both offense and defense, and continuing to develop the OL.

    Sometimes the current draft makes us forget about the development of the young players already on the team the last 3 years. They’re part of the team we want to see hold up that trophy. 🙂

    The last two draft classes taking the next step is ahead of this draft. If those guys don’t take the next step, this draft won’t save that.

    Tua is the key and he and everyone knows that. The QB is huge. We can still be a good team without him, but if he makes that big 2nd year jump, we could be in the AFC Championship Game.

    • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

      As there is more than one way to skin a cat, I believe there are multiple pathways to success in this Draft. I don’t think anybody is really being argumentative with any other here, rather we see so many ways to win… and that is WINNING!

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        I wasn’t focused on argumentative, more about seeing the youth of the team becoming a better team. That’s all.

        Mike E will call me out, but this is how I view the Grier/Flores regime. LOL
        Phase I: Tear it down, create a new culture and add players that fit.
        Phase II: With a lot draft capital get your QB, revamp the OL and defense.
        Phase III: Continue to build on that and add playmakers.

        Our offseason prior to the draft in FA and with trades in 2021 wasn’t flashy, but quietly good.

  75. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Tim,
    I have no idea who that guy is doing that video, but he sucked. He got so many things wrong I stopped watching about 2/3 of the way through. On almost every play he talks about how bad Hunt’s feet are…and they are….but says how great he is. On one play, he talks about how smart Kindley is by holding one guy as he works his way to a second level block. The only problem is Kindley is the one being held, and he’s trying to disengage from the defender and can’t….and was completely ineffective. On many plays, the dude talks about how great they do but their defenders still make the tackle. Give me a break. What a horrible video. Lol

  76. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    First, win our division. Second, MAKE the playoffs. We haven’t even done those things yet. This team still has a lot of work to do.

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      Have those videos rubbed off on you🤪

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Use your own eyes not the commentary. 🙂

        Why are so many of you looking to shoot shit down? LOL

        The conversations have been really good but now it’s time for Debbie Downer shit I see. Sigh… 😉

        Kwity Paye is not that good but everyone in the biz has him 1st round. Okay! LOL

      • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

        You say use your eyes, then

        Kwity Paye is not that good but everyone in the biz has him 1st round. Okay! LOL

        Then you listen to what they say

  77. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Dead money on Flowers is 6m, we gained only a little over 3m in cap space, currently 10.1m

    Fluker contract is in, at 850k 1 yr, so counts nothing against the top 51 as others not in the top 51 also have the same figure

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I think it’s simply a youth movement. Didn’t need Flowers anymore. Jackson, Hunt and Kindley are the reason for this trade. When’s the last time we drafted 3 OL in the same draft and still have positive promise in their 2nd seasons?

      These guys got key reps and snaps to get their pro careers going along with their #5 QB. 😉

      Grier and Flores are doing it the right way. It’s not always perfect but they have been building the trenches and QB. Oh yeah… CB too because the way Belichick/Flores likes to play defense is press and man with blitz schemes. No easy catches.

      We have been building up our secondary on a very high level the last two years. I don’t see us going DB early this year.

  78. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    Direct hit

  79. Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

    ———————
    Alright… LOL…

    First off, Kwity Paye is NOT an “EDGE monster”. That’s a total misnomer of his game, Joe.
    Lastly, Kwity Paye is NOT an “EDGE monster”. That’s a total misnomer of his game, Joe.

    • Marinofan13's avatar marinofan13 says:

      YES, I believe Kwity Paye to be a 1st-rounder… but NOT for US… and he is NOT an “EDGE” at the NFL level. He’s a tweener who doesn’t do anything excellently, but does a lot of things well.

      I’m telling y’all, he’s Jared Odrick (that NOT a knock). We have too many of those on our team already, IMO.

      We need PLAYMAKERS! Paye isn’t a playmaker.

  80. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    Parsons R1P6, Paye at R1P18. Draft all the WR and RB you want after that.

  81. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    Phelon I think it’s around 24 days I’ll be in Key West!

  82. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Kwity Paye is a front 7 multiple player. He’s built like John Randle – very compact but bigger and faster physically. I personally like Paye. He fits our scheme at multiple front 7 positions. He measured in at 6-2.5 261 running a 4.54 at pro day. He’s a motivated individual (if you know his story), non-stop motor who will do whatever you ask him to do. Big upside with this guy, I think some of you are sleeping on him.

  83. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    When the fish in key west hear WY is coming

  84. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    We have many options. This is a pretty talented draft. Four picks in the top 50. 🙂

  85. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    The Flowers trade seems strange due to the very minimal cap savings. I guess they just want the young guys to play

  86. Rhino's avatar Rhino says:

    Flowers trade is exactly what I wanted to hear. Building around Tua ids NOT done with skill positions but with the trenches (skill positions 2nd rd). Ladies and Gentlemen, we have grown ups in our Front Office. Building a ‘team’ means winning the trenches. Developing QB means winning the trenches. Trading Flowers PROVES our FO has a plan. We are going Parson/OL in 1st rd, then RB, WR in 2nd.

    Not sexy, but definitely legit. Hunt is a Guard. Also wouldn’t be surprised with Eichenberg in 2nd and move to RT

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      The timing of the trade blows though. We got nothing and really gained nothing to do it. Why pay him the $6M bonus just to trade him to move a few spots at the end of RD7? I think it’s very questionable. No problem moving on with the young guys, but then just cut him and save the money

    • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

      it’s great to build an offensive line however defense wins championships, look at the cowboys with a great offensive line couldn’t make the playoffs.

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        No, both win championships. You have to have a good offense as well as a good defense.

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        Chiefs didn’t win the SB in 2019 because they had the best defense, and the Bucs didn’t win in 2020 that way either. Both teams had some of the best offenses, the Bucs were better on D than the Chiefs though.

      • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

        i’m a firm believer in a good run blocking OL, you want to make it to the top? play D and run the ball. pouring all your resources into the OL doesn’t make you a champion, see dallas.

      • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

        the Bucs have a great D

  87. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    Want
    Pitts/Parsons/Harris/Cox

    Get
    Smith/Harris/Rousseau/Leatherwood

  88. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Twas the night before draftmas, when all thro’ the blog

    the only thing stirring, was Davids macy’s log

    The draft picks were hung by the chimney with care,

    In hopes that Pitts soon would be there;

    The piggy was nestled all snug in his bed,

    While visions of Najee danc’d thru his head

  89. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Sonny – So instead of Cox you got Leatherwood? Seems like the same, no? 🙂

  90. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    the chiefs didn’t win because of a great ol either, it was their te, wrs & qb,

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      They had a pretty good O-line too, they won because they have a very good coach, a great QB, good O-line, decent defense, but yes, great skill position players at WR and TE and good RB’s.

      • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

        i really think SF blew that game, it was a crazy playoffs for them that year, falling behind the texans and titans, they were a soft team lucky to win it all, it didn;t fare well to them in tampa, their softness shined thru.

  91. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    To make his trade to Washington from Miami official, OL Ereck Flowers restructured his contract whereby the Dolphins will pay $6 million in a signing bonus and Washington will pay a $3 million base salary, giving Flowers $9M fully guaranteed this year.
    ________________________________________________

    so they saved 3 mil by trading him whereas they would’ve ate the whole 9m cutting him.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      No, we only saved $2M, he has $8M in dead cap space, so we saved $2M this season

      • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

        if so that’s better than zero,
        evidently they missed on him, giving him that big contract, just like the josh rosen debacle, i still think rosen is better than tua.
        this F.O. has made some mistakes, but no one is full proof, most of the time it’s a crap shoot. we should be better assessing a veteran OL, not saying Flowers was bad but he didn’t live up to his contract apparently.

  92. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Rob, we have one 1st RD pick on the O-line at the moment, Austin Jackson. Hunt was a 2nd, Kindley a 4th. How is that “pouring all their resources”? If we spend another first, that means we poured all our resources?

    • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

      we should definitely make the OL better, hell yeah!
      i’m hoping last years picks pan out.
      instead of drafting najee or pitts we need to focus on D and the ol

  93. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    T minus 36 hours

  94. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    Who is the QB?
    three years – 7,386 passing yards, 69 touchdown passes and 15 interceptions

  95. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    as for hunt he was taken 39 overall, that isn’t chump change!
    deiter was taken 78th overall.
    jackson 18th overall
    kindley was taken 111, and he seems to be the best value in relation to where he was drafted.
    so yes we hve used valuable draft picks to bolster our ol

  96. Rhino's avatar Rhino says:

    As of now it looks like Kindley to left G (where he played in college), Hunt at right G, and Fluker at RT (and of course Jackson at LT).
    Our draft goals may not have changed at all if we consider “Flowers replaced by Fluker” on OL.
    Getting depth could still be the goal. There’s no guarantee that Sewell would be available and if he were drafted would he feel comfortable at RT? If Sewell is available I believe we’d take him and figure out where to line people up.
    But basically I see it as Fluker replacing Flowers and OL issues haven’t improved or deteriorated … they are the same.

Leave a comment