The Wedge Scouting Report: Derwin James, FSU

(Wedge says something but you can’t hear him)

(Wedge says something again but all you hear is a muffled voice)

(Wedge again says something inaudible moving his hands frantically in the air)

WedheGas

Fine!  If I take off the gas mask – can you hear me now?  It’s dangerous because I’m working with deadly gas here!  I’m developing new gasses that can cloak an entire lunar valley.  If I get it right the entire valley will be cloaked and everything will have no choice but to breathe in the deadly gas.  And of course they will die…painfully…so I did my job!

If only the Dolphins could cover receivers like that…especially Tight Ends.  Am I right?

Well let me introduce you to a solution Derwin James from Florida State University.

DerwinJames5

The Positives:  Once the combine comes around the positives will be on full display.  Derwin James is an elite athlete.  At 6’3, 211 He has length, size and speed.  James is probably going to leave the combine as one of the more notable prospects.

He’s been an athlete for some time.  He was a five star recruit in high school before Florida State.  Those skills showed up as a freshman.  James joined a talented secondary at FSU in 2015 (you might recall a guy named Jalen Ramsey on the Seminoles defense in 2015) and made an immediate impact.  91 total tackles, 9.5 for a loss, 2 forced fumbles and an impressive 4.5 sacks.

But what really jumps out to me is his versatility.  James isn’t Ramsey.  There won’t be a debate about whether he is a cornerback or safety in this alien’s opinion – he’s undeniably a safety but he’s a real good one.

James can play center field like a traditional free safety.  He moves around the field well covering those wide receivers who are running deep.  He is also a fearless tackler who can play closer to the line of scrimmage,  But he also has the length to play man coverage the way the Dolphins want to play effectively, either on a wide receiver or – and MORE IMPORTANTLY on a big tight end.

DerwinJames2

The Negatives:  From a statistics standpoint his resume has a few holes.  For one, his best year was his freshman year.  Albeit his 2017 numbers are pretty good too:  84 tackles, 5.5 for a loss and 1 sack –  but those numbers aren’t as good as 2015.  What about 2016?   Well that’s the real hole.  He missed a huge part of that season because of injury.

The one thing that jumps our about those stats is that he is not a ball hawk.  3 career interceptions at FSU.  I actually personally don’t doubt that he has it in him but the numbers in college just don’t show it.

Recently it seems like James is dropping a little in terms of draft stock.  That means very little in January.  Guys will rise and fall and in his case, I tend to think he will shoot up draft boards after the combine.

DerwinJames3

The Alien Dust:  I know what you Earthlings are thinking.  What?  A safety?  We have two good ones in Jones and McDonald – what’s the point of adding one at 11?  Well here is the idea – you are playing three safeties – yes three at the same time.  It’s a substitute to a coverage LB type.  You are pretty much playing at least 5 DBs all the time.  With hard hitting safeties playing like linebackers.

For the Dolphins, a big part of James’ job is STOP THE TIGHT END, something that seems to be the achilles heal of this defense.

James may be one of the best athletes in the draft.  Taking a player like that at 11 might be a difference maker on defense.  Of course this little alien floated a similar theory last offseason when I suggested drafting Jabril Peppers.  So if you didn’t like that idea – you won’t like this one either.

DewrinJames4

I think about Derwin James cloaking over Rob Gronkowski and I think – we are going to suffocate the Patriots.  Kind of like this gas I am making will suffocate some life form I am about to obliterate.

That’s why if I am comparing James to an Alien Weapon of Destruction, there is no question – James is a set of Suffocating Crater Gas Bombs.

James GasBombs

You can check out his highlights here

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in SCOUTING REPORTS, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

794 Responses to The Wedge Scouting Report: Derwin James, FSU

  1. Ken's avatar Ken says:

    Nice report Wedge

  2. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    There are always options and this is one of them. We’re a team with a lot of issues throughout the roster and with coaching. It’s the same as every year. We can go anywhere from 6-10 to 10-6. We’ll have games like the New England one where we’ll look brilliant, then we’ll play the Central High School Wildcats and get blown out for 3 quarters.

  3. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Good job Piggy! I think I’m warming up to the idea of just bringing in talented, athletic players. We’ll find a place for James. a lot of defenses are doing things like this. He’s got the length to cover TE’s, and if he’s physical enough to play in the box, he’ll stay on the field enough to make a difference. Like you said, we need guys that are difference makers.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      One caveat – We just have to fix the damn O-line. We have to take a player in this draft that we can just start from day one, and that player be an effective part of the team.

      • rich0322's avatar rich0322 says:

        If we were to take James in the 1st, I think either Isaiah Wynn from Georgia or Braden Smith from Auburn needs to be a player we target on day 2.

      • rich0322's avatar rich0322 says:

        Because I think Nelson, McGlinchey, and Billy Price will all be gone by the time we pick on day 2.

  4. Rhino's avatar Rhino says:

    Thanks for presenting info on James, Piggy… the ‘blurbs’ from the mock drafts are so generic.
    MF13 won’t like his low # of INTs LOL (not a “ball hawk” as you stated). Also, can anyone even cover Gronk for a full game?

    Our defense was not as bad as pundits make it out to be. What might make a good article/research for someone here who is inclined…. look at the defensive stats in games where our Offense has at LEAST equal time of possession. My “gut-memory” (new form of intelligence I just made up) tells me: defense for 2017 ranked 16th yards/game but 29th pts/game. A tired-ass defense has a hard time stopping hurry ups and late game drives.

    If we can get Nelson its a no-brainer… even though most mocks don’t see him getting past the 49ers. Our best hope is that Clev goes defense at #4, and SF goes WR at #9. That realistically leaves TB.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I kind of think a better running game and keeping our defense off the field
      Is probably the best route too

      And Nelson makes a lot of sense. He seems like a real safe pick

      But there are murmurs about not taking an OG and I don’t think they are done improvemenging the talent on defense

      If they go defense in the first I think it will be to address the holes we have seen in the secondary. It may be a LB who covers well or it might be this safety fallback option (3 safeties)

  5. rich0322's avatar rich0322 says:

    I would love to get Fitzpatrick, but it’s very doubtful he would fall to us. While I think James is the better athlete, I think Fitzpatrick is the better football player. With that said, if Nelson is gone, I don’t mind taking James.

  6. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    rgs – Billy Price might be there day 2, but he’s the only guy out of the ones you mentioned that has a shot to make it to pick #42

  7. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    I think we have average on offense. Yes, the OL needs to be improved….both thru getting better players and better performance. But, our skill players simply aren’t above average talent. Landry would be the only guy I think we have on offense who is better than just an average or a little above average player. Nobody on this offense is the sort of guy who wins games or consistently makes big plays for you…other than Landry. MAYBE Drake becomes that, but we don’t know anything for certain yet. He has to do it for awhile. So, we need to improve our OL, but we also need to improve our skill positions. It’s not all on the OL.

    • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

      Playmakers…….playmakers

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      Sometimes I thought no offense just needs to click to bring out the talent

      TE jumps out as a place where we lack talent
      But generally speaking, I wouldn’t change the personnell at WR or RB

      I think improvement on the OL may be that piece we need but honestly I don’t even think the personnel on our OL is bad

      It may be a matter of perception but so far we are paper tigers offensively
      The pieces are there – they aren’t clicking though

      There a few things that might be changed that might be difference makers

  8. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  9. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    If you want to see a 3 headed hydra of Drake – Michel – Freeman this is your draft

    11: R1P11
    G QUENTON NELSON
    NOTRE DAME
    42: R2P10
    RB SONY MICHEL
    GEORGIA
    73: R3P9
    QB KURT BENKERT
    VIRGINIA
    113: R4P11
    TE HAYDEN HURST
    SOUTH CAROLINA
    132: R4P30
    RB ROYCE FREEMAN
    OREGON
    187: R6P9
    LB MICAH KISER
    VIRGINIA
    224: R7P5
    EDGE EBENEZER OGUNDEKO
    TENNESSEE STATE
    230: R7P11
    C COLEMAN SHELTON
    WAS

  10. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    The thing of pig dreams

  11. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Piggy, good write up. Not sure about Safety at #11 but it all comes down to BPA for me. It would be great if we could match BPA to need but that’s not always available.

  12. There’s plenty of day 2 offensive linemen to be had. OL is deep in this draft.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      There usually is. Gotta go get some.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      Yeah but I think Nelson is a cut above the rest and more likely to be an impact

      There seems to be some hesitancy taking an OG so early. Ideally the Dolphins would trade down and still get Nelson. Right now that looks like the best scenario to me

      6 picks before Round 4 is through: a late First, two seconds, a third and two courts

      I think you can get that OG, a very good RB, a quality back up or prospective starter for QB, a good TE (maybe even 2) and a little defensive help

  13. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I have no idea how accurate (or inaccurate) any of the mocks are, but Quenton Nelson is usually gone Top 10. We don’t need to trade down, if we draft a guy at 11 that fixes the O-line, I almost don’t care if we take him at #3, just please, fix it! Nelson seems like the most qualified OL in this draft, and that has a lot to do with him going early.

  14. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    We probably need 2 WR’s if we let Landry go, because I know I’m not counting on much from Devante Parker. We could be looking at Stills, Grant, Carroo, Rashawn Scott, maybe Drew Morgan, Francis Owusu. What was perceived as a huge strength before this season will really change a lot next season. We’ll probably have to draft another WR before day 3

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Parker will most likely be on of our WRs but I understand not having much confidence in him. That sucks too because he is talented. He always has some foot/ankle issues.

  15. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    Another 1st round flop…..at least as of now. Have gotten nothing out of him….

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Nothing is a strong word, he has had some good games and made some big plays. Consistency? No

      What’s weird is that was a heavy WR class and a lot of them have not performed well. Even Cooper had a shit season.

      • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

        He’s a 1st rounder. He’s done nothing they couldn’t put an UDFA in there and do….They all are going to make a good/great catch from time to time.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        ER, I’m sensitive to the word “nothing”. My wife tells me I do nothing when that’s not true. I just didn’t do everything. LOL

  16. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    I’m done with Parker if you couldn’t tell……
    I really hope he proves to be otherwise, but I really don’t think he’ll ever be that alpha WR this team and us fans thought he would be. He’s shown no reason to think otherwise

  17. rich0322's avatar rich0322 says:

    The Dolphins need to stay away from 1st round WRs. Since 1991, only OJ McDuffie would be considered a success. As a franchise they haven’t drafted well at that position in the 1st round.

    • rich0322's avatar rich0322 says:

      Which brings me back to one of the reasons why I don’t like drafting WRs in the 1st round. …Miami’s track record. Lol.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I think with the exception of the elite WRs who go 1st round, it’s a position that produces a lot of busts or don’t live up to expectations. WR is always the deepest position in numbers. You can find quality guys in other rounds. They’re available in FA as well.

  18. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    Lol Tim

    So true!

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I told you guys

      Trade down from 11 to 18
      Nab another 2nd rounder
      Take Nelson at 18
      Then use a 2nd rounder to select Guice (who will fall bc to the 2nd based on the voodoo I’ve been practicing)

      Presto – we run for 4000 yards in 2018

      And then we have 4 more picks before the 4th round is through to address everything else

      It’s easy
      Trust in Pig

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      No patience for developing young players already on the team, got to pick up another DB. We don’t need a 1st rd DB and I do not think these guys they’re all throwing around are clear BPAs. I’m gonna stop looking at them now. Wait until combine and pro days. We all know that sets up a lot of the consensus.

  19. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    I feel like no position is safe from first round blunders…lol

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Of course, but WR is a position teams reach for based on size and speed. It should be more about hands and football movement. That’s why Issac Bruce goes 2nd rd and Antonio Brown 6th rd. Did that not show up on tape? Not very big so that’s scary. LOL

  20. So Mayfield is using #GetMeToMiami on his Instagram

  21. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    You know what, I though Mayfield was smaller than I’m seeing him listed. The consensus is 6-1 220. That’s not really small, just a bit short. For those of you who watched him play, how would you rate his arm strength and speed/agility, because to me that’s what he needs to overcome his height. Brees isn’t a runner but he can move around to find openings and passing lanes and he has the arm. From some highlights I’ve seen and what others say, he is a gamer and plays the position really well. Okay, does he project to be able to play that way in the NFL?

  22. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Mayfield wants to play for the Doofus Brigade?

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I think some team will take him before we pick. It’s possible 4-5 QBs go top 10. Not the order as we see it but trades too. Teams have seen that passing on some QBs over the years was not a good idea. I think it’s a frenzy this year.

  23. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    How come only defensive players get tired by playing? I have always heard the time of position excuse for defenses. You have never heard any say, yeah, but the offense was tired, they had the TOP by 10 minutes…..
    O linemen play as hard and for as long as D linemen. Don’t the WR’s and TE’s run as much as the D backs and LB’s? I have never understood this. Our average TOP this year was 29:24. Did an average difference of 36 seconds per game really make a difference? EXCUSE

    It’s the Defense’s fault that the TOP is unbalanced in some games as much as it is the Offense’s. If you want to get off the field then make a play on third down and freaking get off the field. Oh no! The offense went 3 an out, or only had two series in a row. OK, make a play and stop them from making the 1st down.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      The offense controls the tempo and along with 1st downs personnel changes. Defenses play a lot of backpedaling, the offense chooses what to do. Defenses don’t tend to take out their best players on crucial drives. So if they’re out there for 5-7 minutes with the offense moving the ball, it gets tough. Think about running around as LBs and DBs chasing and covering people all day and now you’re getting hammered with a running game as the game wears down.

      Are you now questioning the laws of football since it’s inception? LOL

  24. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    improvemenging???

  25. Ken's avatar Ken says:

    My nightmare is drafting Mayfield in the 1st

  26. Ken's avatar Ken says:

    Tim:
    I have watched a lot of Mayfield. I would rate his arm as average. He can make all the throws but it is not an elite arm like Allen, Rosen or Darnold. In terms of speed and agility I would say he is more elusive as opposed to straight line speed. He is not slow but he is not RG III or Michael Vick in terms of running ability

  27. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    Who was it on here that had the uber-crush on Manziel?

  28. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Positions I don’t see a “need” for this offseason as in starters at this time. We can ask what about if this or that happens, but that’s for every team.
    C, LT, QB, RB, WR, DT, CB and S

    James is the key to RT. If we lose Landry – Stills, Parker and Grant will still be a part of the WR packages. To me G, TE, DE and LB are the biggest needs in order or BPA. That’s how I’d try to roll.

    • Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

      Dilly Dilly

      But I put QB on that list too. We NEED a good heir apparent.We never had one in place after Marino or any time since. I don’t think we need to replace Tannehill, but I think we should have a good player behind / competing with him. How many QB’s have the Patriots traded away for 3rd or higher round picks?

  29. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Mayfield wants to play for us

  30. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    I think Mayfield is the real deal and might end up having the best career of any of the qbs in this draft

    Those are just the oinks

  31. Tim Knight says:
    January 18, 2018 at 7:25 pm
    Because he was great in college. A lot of his good plays are clean pocket and guys wide open. Things get faster and tighter at the next level. Can he play well at the next level is my concern.

    _____________________

    You see the same thing I do. A ton of wide open guys to throw the ball to witch isn’t the norm in the NFL. Much tighter windows and although you may see him hit a player from time to time who has some coverage he’s not been challenged a lot because of the prolific offense his coach designed and implemented to perfection which gets a variety of targets open and gives Mayfield any number of options to throw to.

    I don’t think the comparison to Wilson is valid as he doesn’t have Wilson’s escapability and I think Wilson was ahead of where he is now. He’s definitely not got the same skill as a Brees and I’m not sure he ever reaches that level of proficiency at the position.

    So, I share your concern about him playing that well at the next level. Can he be serviceable? Probably. But, IMO, I don’t think he’s going to be one to reach the elite status that a lot of fans see him attaining.

    • Ken's avatar Ken says:

      I think the 2nd half vs Georgia in the bowl game showed a lot of his short comings. He had difficulty throwing into tight windows. He also showed difficulty in dealing with a disciplined pass rush that stayed in its lanes. He didn’t show that ability to get outside and create like he normally does.

  32. The problem now that Mayfield has put it out there that he’d like to be drafted by Miami is that Anthony Molina, uh, I mean Steve Ross, will want to make a splash in the draft and OG’s don’t make a splash in the draft.

  33. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    He’s definitely not got the same skill as a Brees and I’m not sure he ever reaches that level of proficiency at the position.

    But Brees didn’t have the same skill as Brees his first 2-3 years. Brees had 53 interceptions his first 4 years (not counting the one game he played his rookie year, when he sat

    • Ken's avatar Ken says:

      Brees was a much more complete prospect coming out of college. He was a very polished passer with a stronger arm than Mayfield

    • Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

      not campaigning for Mayfield here. I don’t know anything at all about him. (or any other college prospect at this point of the season, except maybe Dallas Goedert because I watched his HIGHLIGHT real and got a crush)

  34. It would be extremely funny if all those fans were getting excited about nothing because Mayfield just wanted to GetToMiami to Party!! lol

    • and not after being drafted. if the hastag was he just wanted to visit Miami for the nightlife and that’s all he meant by the post. you go back and read his previous Instagram posts and there’s some hot chick in Miami who said she wants him to visit her there and he’s like “yeah, get me to Miami!!”

  35. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Rock, I don’t get the value in drafting QBs just so you can trade them down the road. If they never play the value will be the same or less and if they did play well and garner a higher pick why are you trading them? Because you have a QB already. I don’t want to draft a prospect so I can trade that player a few years later. I want prospects who help my team. If it works out that way sometimes fine, that shouldn’t be the goal.

  36. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Career INT%

    Mason Rudolph: .0180
    Luke Falk: .0190
    Baker Mayfield: .0200
    Logan Woodside: .0214
    Josh Rosen: .0222
    Mike White: .0223
    Kurt Benkert: .0227
    Lamar Jackson: .0249
    Sam Darnold: .0260
    Josh Allen: .0324

    My two guys (Rudolph and Woodside) stack up rather well to the competition. And as you can see, Mayfield is no slouch.

  37. I just look at Benkert’s game vs the Canes as a microcosm of his career in VA. He throws 4 td’s, finds guys when he’s moving to his right or left, dropping dimes over defenders heads for td’s and then when he needs his guys to make plays they’re dropping passes that are right in their hands.

    His group of rb’s, TE’s and wr’s probably lead the NCAA in dropped passes and if they don’t they’re probably damn near the top. He had little in the way of a run game to work with and his o-line wasn’t the best either but the guys got all the tools in his toolbox and all he needs is the right coach.

    If Gase is truly a quarterback whisperer this guy can be made into a deadly weapon.

  38. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    professorloumiamidolphinsblog says:
    January 18, 2018 at 8:57 pm
    those numbers don’t tell the entire story, unfortunately. you’ve got to look at the games.
    —————
    “Are you serious, Clark?” 🙂

    Agreed that the games tell a larger tale, but these numbers are not insignificant… especially being most of these QBs have logged more than 1,000 pass attempts over the course of 3 or 4 years. We’re not talking about a game or even a single season… we’re talking CAREER numbers, here.

    These numbers certainly aren’t a ‘tell all’ figure, but you can really see who is allergic to throwing INTS. As a GM or HC, I LIKE seeing QBs who don’t throw INTs.

  39. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    If your just going off surrounding talent?
    Look at Allen’s 2016 stat’s not his 2017!!!!!!!!!!!!

  40. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Wyoming,

    When I look at Josh Allen, I see a QB who has MANY more strengths than weaknesses (see my reply to Pig last evening). He may need a year or two to fully develop into an NFL QB, but he’s got a lot going for him that sets him apart from most. I see a 1st round QB, in short.

  41. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Luke Easterling

    Verified account

    @LukeEasterling
    4m4 minutes ago
    More
    Josh Allen:

    – Rare natural talent
    – Accuracy/consistency issues
    – Sub-par supporting cast
    – Impressive athleticism

    Projection: Top 5

    Lamar Jackson:

    – Rare natural talent
    – Accuracy/consistency issues
    – Sub-par supporting cast
    – Impressive athleticism

    Projection: Day 2 or WR

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      It’s like he cut and paste his scouting reports

      That’s the hung with both of these two is accuracy issues

      I still think Allen has great potenatial

      I always liked watching jackson at Louisville but I would not spend a high pick on him

      Frankly I don’t get the high rankings of Rosen and darnold
      I don’t really like either
      But I’ve never professed that evaluating qbs is my strength

      I fell like it’s throwing darts in the dark
      There’s been a few over the years I knew would suck but for the most part I struggle to pick successful qbs

    • I don’t see Allen as a top 5 or even a 1st rd guy. He’s another qb like a Benkert who will need to sit and learn behind a starter for at least a year if not two before he’s ready to take the reigns.

      • mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

        I’m very interested to see where he goes.

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        The right place for him is the 2nd round IMO
        And he might develop into a very good QB
        But given the level of competition he played against and his accuracy issues – It just looks like asking some one to make a big jump

      • Accuracy issues don’t all of a sudden disappear when a qb goes to the NFL. Some guys can work on them with a good qb coach and get better; others never get over the hump.

        Wentz had a bit of an accuracy issue when he was at NDSU but he worked hard between his rookie year and this year on his mechanics and you saw a definite improvement. So it’s possible that somewhere down the road you can see a qb improve on accuracy. Just need the right person to work with.

  42. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Pig,

    You’re not alone, Bro: QB is the most difficult position to evaluate, by far. MOST of it comes from the neck on up, and even that is difficult to project at the NFL level.

  43. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

  44. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

  45. Baker Mayfield‏
    Verified account

    @baker_mayfield6
    Follow
    Follow @baker_mayfield6

    More
    Just so everybody knows… I commented about playing for Miami because I was talking to a former Sooner in Kenny Stills. Everybody can relax, I will play anywhere that gives me a chance. I’m not picky, I will go anywhere and strive to uplift a franchise and win ball games.

  46. Ken's avatar Ken says:

    I used to think Allen was going to be a 2nd round pick because he was going to need time to develop. While that is still true about needing time to develop but after watching him in his bowl game I came away knowing that he is a top 5 pick or higher. Of all the QBs in this draft he has the highest ceiling. His combination of size, strength, arm strength, speed and mobility is off the charts. He reminds me of a young Big Ben or even more accurately a young Elway. If he lands in Cleveland I hope they do not rush him in to the starting line up until he is ready. I think the ideal landing spot for him would be the Giants assuming they keep Eli for another year or 2

  47. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    I was shocked when Indy took Peyton Manning over Ryan Leaf!

  48. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    ocalarob says:

    January 19, 2018 at 6:47 am

    watch the feet
    *****************

    That’s what Rex said . . .

  49. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miami-dolphins/fl-sp-dolphins-landry-20180119-story.html

    I agree with Bilbo in regards to the routes that Landry runs. I know some people think he’s only limited to those routes because of his athleticism, but I think it’s what they ask him to do, because they want to get the ball out quickly, because they don’t trust the O-line. I think Landry could be much more than he is right now, we just don’t give him opportunities to go downfield.

  50. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    I agree with Randy’s 12:20 post. The offense is mostly average. No real game changers. Parker has the tools, but not the head. Drake is a RB and RB don’t consistently change games. Landry maybe could be, but I have to think that if he could stretch the field, they would be using him to do so.

    That said, I don’t believe Miami takes a guard in the 1st. They don’t value the position enough and guards don’t change games. I think they will go LB or, if one of the top projects is there, QB.

    • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

      I totally disagree, Guards and running backs do change games, you have to be able to run the ball to have any success. Basic Football 101

      • pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

        RB and OG are the backbone of football, but they don’t change games. If they did, Dallas would still be playing and Miami would have made the Super Bowl when they had Ricky Williams.

  51. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Mike E. says:
    January 19, 2018 at 8:28 am
    we just don’t give him opportunities to go downfield.
    ________________________________________________
    Landry has had the opportunity to line up wide and go deep, he just can’t beat the CBs in that situation, he’s very quick but he’s not fast and they use him to his strengths

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      I guess the only way to find that out is if he leaves and goes somewhere else, and then becomes a different player. I have a feeling if he goes somewhere else, he’s going to raise that YPR quite a bit.

  52. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    I don’t think any team will pay Landry within reach of the highest paid #1 WR’s in the game, he just doesn’t have the top end speed.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      He’s not going to get AB or Julio $$$, but he will probably get about $12-13M from some team who has plenty of cap money to spend, like SF, or maybe even the Jets.

  53. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    not many teams have lead the league in Rushing and went on to win the superbowl, the 72 Dolphins did. it’s not about leading the league in rushing it’s about keeping D’s guessing on run or pass, it’s about being able to pick up the 4 to 6 yards on first down setting up 2nd and 3rd and short yardage. what will the offense do? the playbook is wide open, do we put 8 in the box and stop this beast? or do we play pass. when you run the ball on 1st down and lose 3 yards it’s no longer a guessing game for the D, they know you have to pass and furthermore they disrespect your run making it hard for the offense to get 1st downs, they go 3 and out and put pressure on your D, it effects the whole team.

  54. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  55. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Brady will have to go thru hand surgery at the end of the season,

    They’ll have to attach another finger to accommodate the six rings!

  56. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    The 49ers, Colts, Jets, Bucs, Texans, Redskins, heck, even the Browns may be interested in Landry, and all have significantly more cap room than we do.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      We can adjust our cap with a few restructures and cuts, so our cap room can definitely expand, and will.

    • Ken's avatar Ken says:

      The Pats would be very interested in Landry as well. Not sure they will pay him what he wants but he fits the mold of their ideal type WR

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        Pats won’t overpay for any player, so I don’t think they’ll even look at him if the price goes beyond $12M, which I think it will.

  57. If a quarterback is drafted top 5 he’s not sitting for a year.

  58. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    Yeah, I’ve said this before. The Pats aren’t going to pay Landry what he wants when they can just draft a nobody QB in the 7th round and turn him into a wide receiver of the same caliber, grab someone at the end of camp cuts, or just trade a draft pick.

  59. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    I really think the Jags have a chance this weekend.

  60. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    If Landry will sign for $12M-$13M a year, they should sign him. If he’s holding out for $15M+, fuck’em. Welker had three consecutive 110-reception seasons (and has five total), was the first receiver in NFL history with at least three 110-reception seasons, and the first with five 100-reception seasons. Welker was never a #1 WR and neither is Landry. He is a nice complimentary piece, but that’s all.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      Defining what a #1 WR is complicated, but you can’t deny he was the #1 option since he’s been here

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Agree with your thinking about how much Landry is worth, but do think that both he and Welker are more than just complimentary pieces. You could throw in that Welker ran wild with the NE talent, QB and schemes….but Landry did what he did here.

  61. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    Something did not know before today (but OD did)…..the 1972 AFC Championship played in Pittsburgh.

  62. New Age's avatar New Age says:

    Landry is our #1 WR and his agent is right. Where are we going to get production like that? Nowhere. Guy led the league his first four years under 3 different QBs. He’s an exceptional talent who knows how to catch the ball. He’s not worth $15 mill but he’s probably worth $14. I can’t understand this FO. They pay middling talent who show one year of results( Alonso, Branch) a huge contract and then want to under pay their top talent. It makes zero sense.

    Call me the Mayfield dude this year. I’d love to have him. Accurate with probably the best field vision in this class. The number of times I’ve seen him look towards and throw to his second and third options is impressive. He has flaws of course but there are a lot of QB evaluators who love him.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Branch and Alonso don’t have huge contracts. Their deals aren’t close to top money at their positions. Landry is looking for money twice what these two are being paid.

  63. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    Number one option yes, number one receiver no. Ask yourself what he would be on the same roster as Julio Jones or Antonio Bryant.

  64. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    Stanger were it not for “the immaculate reception ” that good would have been played in Oakland

  65. New Age's avatar New Age says:

    Tim,

    And his impact is far above theirs. He leads the league in receptions. He’s the blanket option for our QBs the past 4 years. Branch has the 16th highest DE average salary in the entire NFL. Alonso’s is the 26th highest among all linebackers. Are they even close to worth those numbers? NOPE.

    Landry is our #1 WR. Without, or a draft pick we don;t need to use, our offense would do a lot worse. And it was a bad offense.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I don’t look at their deals as an example of paying Landry $15M per. Branch is a 3 year deal with an easy out in 2019. Alonso is a 4 year deal with a possible out in 2019 and easy out in 2020. They aren’t cap strapping deals for vet starters. Landry is not Julio Jones or Antonio Bryant errr… I mean Brown. LOL

  66. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Phelon – Who is the #1 WR on our team? I know who it’s supposed to be, but . . .

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      Landry would kill it if he were on a team with Julio Jones or AB.. He wouldn’t have as many receptions, but he’d probably have the same yardage. He’s a damn good receiver, let’s be honest.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Nobody is doubting Landry is a damn good receiver and football player but he doesn’t put up big numbers, let’s be honest about that. Catches are his only big stat and we all know most of them are with 5 yards. I think what he’s asking for is way beyond his production level.

  67. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  68. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Weeeeeeeeeeeeeee

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      If he misses time, that really hurts the Jets. He was easily their biggest threat, and he had a nice season this past season.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      If he did all of this he’s probably going to jail.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      LOL — You know what happens after you tell a cop you are going to find his wife and ““f–k her and n-t in her eye”? Every charge the guy can think of. In this case, “harm to a public servant/family, reckless driving, eluding police, and resisting arrest, fleeing while lights/siren active, failure to drive in a single lane, two counts of disobeying a red light, speeding and turning without a signal.”

  69. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    11. Miami Dolphins — Tremaine Edmunds, LB, Virginia Tech

    http://draftscout.tsxfiles.com/2018/01/16/bruglers-2018-mock-draft/

  70. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    If you are not talking about the Dolphins being interested in Landry – I don’t want to hear it!

    (Piggy covers his ears and hides under a pillow)

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      You think he’s worth $15M per?

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        I’m under the impression he is asking for 14M

        15M is a little more than I want to pay
        but I think the FO put themselves in a position to overpay by not getting this done earlier

        I think not losing your top players is worth a lot in general, even overpaying

  71. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Tim

    It’s kind of a Catch 22 discussing Landry. He makes catches within 10 yards of the LOS because that’s what they ask him to do, and he does it, and does it well. He makes a 5 or 10 yards gain out of nothing sometimes. On the other hand, he’s obviously not going to have an elite YPR avg, because they don’t run him deep most of the time To me though, that doesn’t make him less valuable. Not utilized properly maybe, but not less valuable. I’ve seen him make amazing catches downfield, they just don’t have him doing it often. Maybe if Parker and Stills were getting open more, Landry wouldn’t have to “goal-hang” around the LOS to be the escape outlet.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      4 years I think we know what he does and doesn’t do. I don’t think other WRs have anything to do with his production. He deserves to be paid, but the numbers he’s seeking are really high when comparing them to other WRs making that money is all I’m saying. If the team can make him happy and re-sign him I’ll be happy.

      Classic example is Vernon getting $85M with the Giants. Sure he go it but was not worth it. Would you have been happy if we paid him that contract? Good player, not elite.

  72. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    BTW – I don’t think he’s worth $15M. I would hope we can sign him for $12-13M. If some team is going to throw $15M or more at him because they can, it will be unfortunate for us, but we’re going to lose him.

  73. New Age's avatar New Age says:

    I don’t think anyone throws close to $15 but maybe $14 and $13.5 sounds very feasible. He’s the top slot WR in the NFL. He’s better than Hilton and Jeffrey who make $13 a year. He’s the most consistent threat on our offense. Gase would be looking for a new home in 2019 if he had to depend on Parker.

  74. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    Mike E. – We don’t have a classic alpha #1 WR. We have safety blanket Slot Receiver. Don’t get me wrong…I like Landry and want to keep him. I think he brings a lot to the team. But he is not worth Julio Jones or Antonio Bry….Brown money.

  75. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Look at the amount of yards Julio Jones and Antonio Brown have when they catch 100+ balls then look at Landry’s numbers. It’s not the same production.

    Landry lead our receivers at 61.7 YPG and Stills who was 2nd averaged 52.9 on half the catches. I don’t see how Landry’s production = what he’s looking for. It just doesn’t add up.

  76. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Wow!

    Armando Salguero @ArmandoSalguero 3m3 minutes ago
    News: The Miami Dolphins are promoting Ben Johnson to WR coach. He was previously assistant WR coach.

    Armando Salguero @ArmandoSalguero 4m4 minutes ago
    News: The Miami Dolphins are promoting Shawn Jefferson to assistant head coach/offense. He will be helping HC Adam Gase on the offense.

    • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

      So…..We have an OC, whatever Christensen is and now another assistant head coach……

      Think I’m going to fill out an application for a job there….plenty to go around!

  77. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Tim

    I don’t think Vernon is nearly as a good a player at his position as Landry is at his though.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Probably not but that doesn’t mean Landry should be paid like a top WR. His production doesn’t add up to the $. I mean what are they basing it on, he’s not the only WR to catch over 100 balls and quite a few have had more than him with a lot more yards and TD production. He deserves a nice contract but I’m sorry he and his agent are way over the top. If they get it more power to them but the production just isn’t there.

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        I already said he shouldn’t get $15M. My hope is we can sign him for about $13M, and I think he’s worth it, but if it goes much higher, in our situation, as unfortunate as it might be, he’s not the difference between us being a perennial playoff team or not. If we were just that one player away, maybe, but we’re not close to that.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        The problem is too many teams overpaid some of their WRs money that doesn’t equal their production either. But Landry and his agent need to get off the Jones/Brown comparisons because there is no comparison.

  78. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Barry Jackson‏ @flasportsbuzz
    Per source, Clyde Christensen staying with Fins, has accepted position of director of football and player development. Dowell Loggains replaces him as OC.

  79. New Age's avatar New Age says:

    Tim,

    His agent and Landry are trying to push his market up just like the Dolphins want it down. I put numbers for both Hilton and Jeffries. What do you think Landry is worth?

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Those players are not the same as Landry. Jeffrey is a big perimeter WR like a Julio Jones. Hilton is an outside speed guy like Antonio Brown, not as productive, but more so than say Stills. Landry doesn’t make as many big plays as those guys.

    • New Age's avatar New Age says:

      And talking about Julio, he had 22 red zone targets this year and caught 6 of them for 1 TD. Landry? 23 targets, 18 caught for 9 TDs.

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        Both Matt Ryan and Julio Jones had down years.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        5, 4 and 4 the previous seasons. TDs go up and down year to year. But you’re not seriously comparing the two players are you?

        I could make the case that Stills is more productive per catch than Landry. But they’re not the same player either.

  80. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    It seems to me that the coaching changes Gase has made specifically on offense is not only to shake things up, but to take some things off his plate so he can focus more on the overall team.

  81. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Mike E. says:
    January 19, 2018 at 12:14 pm
    Defining what a #1 WR is complicated, but you can’t deny he was the #1 option since he’s been here
    ____________________________________________________

    The opposing defense defines your number 1 WR, he’s the guy they pay the most attention to deep in the secondary and right now that honor may belong to stills

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Probably and to be fair to Landry he’s the one they focus on on 3rd down. I like the mix of Landry, Stills and Parker – if he can get himself going someday.

      • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

        it’s tough to have multiple dbs focus on a possession/slot rec because he usually doesn’t get downfield.

  82. New Age's avatar New Age says:

    Tim,

    I’m talking Landry’s value to the Dolphins specifically. We can go back and forth on yards per catch or whatever but who is our #1 WR? Who is the guy who pushes this offense? I’ve already mentioned Jeffry who is the #2 target in Philly(close to the #3). I mentioned Hilton who had a horrible year without his elite QB. Landry actually had more on his plate and produced more TDs when his QB wasn’t playing. He had a really solid 12 yards per catch with Tannehill.

    The question isn’t who would pay $15 per year because no one would. The question is, can we afford to let Landry go if he’s willing to take $13.5 while knowing he’s a better overall player than Hilton and Jeffry? He’s very similar to Baldwin who got $11.5 two years ago. The difference in available cap between two years ago and this year is about the difference in the two contracts today. Is Landry as good as Baldwin should be our question. He is and therefore deserves a contract around $13.5 yearly. Keep our own, right?

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I get all of that. To me his production should pay him in the $12M range. That’s not chump change. I don’t like him thinking he’s in Jones/Brown range because it’s not realistic. That’s all. Teams can’t just go around paying every player what they want.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Hilton 57-966 16.9 4TD isn’t exactly horrible but expected with where the Colts were at.

      • New Age's avatar New Age says:

        Horrible for him and past production. He expects better and would do better with a better QB. He is the boom or bust guy whereas Landry is the consistency.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        He’s more of a Stills type guy though. Most of his work is over the top.

    • pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

      If I was offering $12M-$13M and he came down to $13.5, I would sign him. Half a million a year isn’t worth losing him.

      • New Age's avatar New Age says:

        Yep. He’s worth $13.5. especially since Stills already got his contract. I wouldn’t go any higher and would try for $12-13 but he’s worth the extra little bit.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Stills’ contract was fair. $8M per for a speedy down the field guy which is what he does.

        Stills 58-847 14.6 6TD and 14 20+.
        Landry 112-987 8.8 9TD and 6 20+.

        I don’t view Landry as worth almost twice that.

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        If the FO offers 12-13m
        Landry offers a 15m
        It’s the FO who should be offering 13.5
        And they haven’t
        They haven’t made a counter offer

        The FO May be dropping the ball

  83. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    I really don’t think Gase wants Landry back so all this talk is moot, Landry verbally attacked Gase on the sideline and we all know what Gase does when verbally confronted, he injects the Ajayi rule, CYA!
    not to mention he told the media that Landry was an embarrassment to the team?
    does this sound like they want to pay him 14 mil per season?

  84. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Just say “No” to overpaying for WRs, please. 🤘🤓😊

  85. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  86. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  87. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    oe Schad

    Verified account

    @schadjoe
    35m35 minutes ago
    More
    Matt Burke is a smart guy. He’ll be better in his second year as Dolphins defensive coordinator.

  88. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    New Age says:
    January 19, 2018 at 2:42 pm (Edit)
    I don’t think anyone throws close to $15 but maybe $14 and $13.5 sounds very feasible. He’s the top slot WR in the NFL. He’s better than Hilton and Jeffrey who make $13 a year. He’s the most consistent threat on our offense. Gase would be looking for a new home in 2019 if he had to depend on Parker.

    *****
    I agree
    It’s hard to believe some one won’t pay him more than 12m

    Honestly the difference between 12-15 is somewhat negligible

    It’s hard to believe the Dolphins can’t make it work

    But yet here we are
    I tend to think the Dolphins FO might be part of the problem not the amounts

  89. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    I wonder if Gase is re-evaluating the way he’s been calling/running this offense. I think the idea that you just take what a team gives you or try to take advantage of mismatches is dependent on your players being able to win and be versatile and good at everything. I don’t think we have the players to do that. I kinda hope we see a bigger emphasis on developing a consistent running game and build from there.

  90. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    I think asking yourself if 15m is too much to pay for landry is really understimating where and why that question is being poised

    when you hear that Landry’s agent made an offer in Mid December
    And the Dolphins have not responded since then
    That’s not about the difference between 12m and 15m
    That’s lack of respect

    Sorry guys but asking whether 15m is too high to pay misses the picture
    Ignoring some ones offer for a month is not a great way to communicate a lower price tag
    Actually waiting until this offseason to sign Landry is not exactly a wise strategy to lower the price

    If Landry signs with some one else for a high price that we didn’t eat to pay
    It’s just bc we didn’t want to pay that price tag
    It’s because we let some one make that offer since we failed to get a deal done before that was an option

    If this works out and they sign Landry below market value – great

    But generally playing a game of chicken with your best player seems like a stupid right so for the FO to take

  91. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Piggy,
    Or, they simply don’t value Landry the same as fans do.

    • D's avatar D says:

      Some fans, there are just as many that are completely undervaluing him by their own beliefs as there are overvaluing him.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I don’t think that’s the issue at all

      We know what reported and it’s not a huge difference between what he is asking for and what is offered.

      Even if the team feels he is not worth one more penny than they offered, they should be commmunicating that to Landry.

      Refusing to respond isn’t putting a cap on some one’s worth it’s just refusing to communicate

      Most people aren’t going to respond well to that if it goes on too long (a month is too long)

      In terms of negotiating, I’m not sure it will lead to the best results

      I’m just speculating based on my expriences negoatiting deals as a lawyer but not responding is generally not “this is as much as I will do or final offer” speech – it’s usually gamesmanship to try to get an advantage

      The FO is probably playing a game of chicken with our best player. That’s fucking stupid if you ask me. They just opened the door to be outbid or to overpay

  92. D's avatar D says:

    My thoughts on Landry is worth probably 12-13mil, Market value giving this weaker class of FA WR’s, 13-14mil. Like Piggy was saying too, when you are only off by a mile or two, you really have to question why you wont be the one to reach across the table instead of being obstinate about them being the one that meets you on your side. Is it because you felt 12 was a stretch in the first place making him just not worth it to you, do you feel you are confidant enough in finding a replacement and that the replacement cost and what ya lose between the two players balances out of ends up better for the team?

    There is a lot that goes into it and there is a line on both sides that neither person should concede just for the sake of the other. There is also a line that is set initially which was optimistic, but weighing it all out, you realize you set the line in the wrong place so you move closer to the other. In the end, i hope both side concede a little and find a happy medium, because we need to keep Landry if possible, but we need to do it at a price that is not only healthy for Landry, but also good for the sake of the overall health of the team.

  93. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    I think the smart way to do it for anybteam is to put a value on a player, decide how much wiggle room you want to give yourself, and don’t worry what the “market” says. The market is different for every team because every organization builds their team the way they feel it should be built. Maybe Landry is worth $15M to one team and only $10M to another, so what is his true “market” value? Who cares? Decide what he’s worth to you and stick to that. Never be afraid to lose any one player unless he’s a true franchise sort of guy like a Tom Brady.
    ***
    Also, if Landry is truly that valuable a player, why does our offense still suck every year? Lol

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      Bc one player won’t make you great
      A few players will though
      Losing one you have will push you farther away though

    • D's avatar D says:

      The market though does very much matter, because it sets his value for that player in relation to what other players are available that off season. It also sets what other teams would value a player at, so that’s kind of factored in. I feel you just dont think that WR’s are due that kind of money because your a meat and potatoes kind of football guy, but truth is that position right now is valued at that amount. Its trending away from it to be hionest, but its still a high compensation position and a top player at that position in a weak competition market is going to rake it in.

  94. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    I think Landry winds up getting a 4 year 50 Million dollar deal with 20 Mil garranteed.

  95. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    Just hypothetical….

    Would you rather spend $15M on Landry or to fix the OL?

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I would rather fix something than spend on something…lol

      You could have said would you rather spend 15m on world hunger or fix world hunger and I would have picked “fixed”.

      I would rather spend money on Landry rather than spend money in the OL – bc I feel like I know what I’m getting in Landry, whereas spending on the OL is less of a sure thing

  96. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    D,
    The problem is that the term “value” is completely subjective….and depends on how a person defines it. If you think it just means how ever much money a player can get, I think that’s myopic. A player’s actual value varies from team to team and situation to situation. That’s why I think every team needs to determine what a player’s value is to them and not overspend just because the market(i.e. another team or two) is willing to pay him more.

    • D's avatar D says:

      Everybody has a number they are willing to spend, but that’s not the same as its value. A car for example can have a value of 150,000 but i cant afford that shit so im going to be willing to may at best 50,000 for it. That means i dont get the car, but it didn’t mean its value was 50,000 just because i cant afford that shit lol.

  97. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Piggy,
    Not if you can use the money you save to augment other areas of your team, and/or you think you can get comparable production for a lot less. I’m not against signing Landry, but I just hope this FO doesn’t overspend on FAs. I never like it, no matter who it is. It’s just a bad business model in my opinion. The only times I can really stomach it is if it’s a truly elite sort of guy.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I think there is a big difference in overpaying FAs and overpaying known commodities that have been on your team

      More importantly, they could have signed Landry for less money a year ago – and they didn’t

      It’s not about overspending. It’s just this FO and the way they decided to negotaiate which out us in position to lose one of our best players

      Btw if you don’t pay Landry and you spend that money somewhere else, you are still overspending aren’t you?

      You are only not spending money to spend it elsewhere
      They are going to be close to spending all of the cap room one way or another

  98. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    I feel like you guys are missing the point of what I said

    If you aren’t communicating it doesn’t matter what value you place on some one

    It doesn’t matter what the fan, the FO it Landry’s side thinks

    They literally aren’t speaking according to Mando’s Reports
    He said Landry’s people made the last offer in Mid Dec and the FO hasn’t replied

    It doesn’t matter what the number is at that point. Either: (a) the FO doesn’t know how they want to spend their $; (b) they are purposely trying to make Landry lower his offer by making him sweat; or (c) they are going to let the market set the price (and tag him so they can match)

    You just don’t forget to respond to an offer for your best player for a month and you just don’t not respond bc you don’t agree with their numbers

    It’s strategy

    And frankly, I hate that strategy
    It’s a game of chicken with you best player

    How are we supposed to become a better team when the FO does that with its best players

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      The FO may simply feel he’s not worth what he’s asking for. That’s been the discussion and they’re the ones who have to pay it. We currently don’t even have the cap space to pay him what he’s looking for so it’s going to have to be heavily backloaded.

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        Then you say it Tim

        You say “we reject you offer and reiterate our offer of __”

        You don’t refuse to respond to an offer made a month ago
        That’s gamesmanship and that does not breed loyalty

Leave a comment