The Wedge Scouting Report: Mike Gesicki, Penn State

 

 

Look at that mismatch!  That powerful Zork can’t be stopped which is why I released him on that unsuspecting village

You think the Zork is a just a big two handed monster, so you set up your planetary defenses to stop a big strong attack – and the Zork slips right through with unexpected speed.

If you try to set up your defense to stop that speed – the Zork overpowers you.

ZorkAttack

Just like some of the talented tight ends in the 2018 draft.

One example:  Mike Gesicki

Gesicki2

The Positives:  This is one athletic tight end!  First of all this guy can soar.  Want to have some fun – google “Mike Gesicki catch” and check out the images of this jumping sky high above defenders.

We’ve seen the NFL make good NFL players out of basketball players.  In this case, Gesicki is a volleyball player.  Every time he goes up for a catch, it looks like he is going to spike it.  But his 10 1/8 inch hands pull the ball in softly.

Oh and he’s fast.  Gesicki ran a 4.54 40 yard dash at the combine.  That speed had him light up opposing defenses that just could not find a way to stop him.  Over the last two years Gesicki had 105 catches, 1242 yards, and 15 touchdowns.

Gesicki8

The Negatives:  This is not your classic tight end.  He’s not going to be much of an asset when it comes to run blocking.  Gesicki is certainly strong, he had 22 reps in the bench press at the combine which was second among tight ends – but I would not call his build prototypical tight end size.  Sure he is 6’5 but he has a bit of a lean lanky build.  He’s not that physical.  Think of Gesicki as more Jimmy Graham than Anthony Fasano.

gesicki4

The Alien Dust:  I wonder if there was a player who helped himself more at the combine.  He wowed everyone.  It wasn’t just a fast 40 yard dash.  He was 1st among tight ends in every category except for bench press…where he fell to 2nd place…lol

This is a special athlete.  He may not be a huge asset in the blocking game – but this a guy who changes an offense.  I believe Gesicki will be a pro bowl receiver in the NFL.

His impressive combine might be enough to vault him into the 1st round.  But I think there is a good chance Gesicki is a 2nd or even a 3rd round pick.  If he lasts to the 4th round – consider every NFL scout a moron.

Gesicki7

Mike Gesicki compares favorably with the destructive Zork!

New Year's Bang

Check out his highlights here:

 

 

This entry was posted in SCOUTING REPORTS, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

767 Responses to The Wedge Scouting Report: Mike Gesicki, Penn State

  1. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  2. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    if 4 QB’s go in the top 5 which is possible I’m putting Mason Rudolph in play at 11. I don’t get why he’s a tier below the other 4 anyway. He could end up being the best of all of them.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I’ve heard pundits say the same thing about Rudolph.

      What are your pros and cons on him?

      • son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

        Big arm
        Big guy 6’5 235
        Smart

        No real cons for me to be honest and I’ll bet the NFL likes him a lot more than the pundits do.

  3. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    NFL.COM has RUDOLPH ranked 6th with the same grades as White and Falk

    PLAYER POS HT WT COLLEGE GRADE
    DARNOLD, SAM* QB 6’3″ 220 USC 7.0
    ROSEN, JOSH* QB 6’4″ 226 UCLA 6.1
    MAYFIELD, BAKER QB 6’1″ 215 Oklahoma 6.0
    ALLEN, JOSH QB 6’5″ 233 Wyoming 6.0
    JACKSON, LAMAR* QB 6’3″ 200 Louisville 5.9
    RUDOLPH, MASON QB 6’5″ 235 Oklahoma St. 5.6
    WHITE, MIKE QB 6’4″ 225 Western Kentucky 5.6
    FALK, LUKE QB 6’4″ 225 Washington St. 5.5

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      6.1 grades or less for QBs are not what you trade up for. It’s gotta be 7.0+.

      I’ve seen a few of the mocksters have Rudolph tied for 5th with I think Mayfield and Allen. Not sure exactly, it might be Mayock, Jeremiah or Brooks.

  4. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Son, gotcha on Rudolph. After seeing the tied for 5th I looked into him more and he looks the part of an NFL QB. Even if he’s not ready in his first year, I’d be fine with him behind Tannehill and let it play out.

    • son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

      Yeah he’d be a nice add. Then get TE with 2nd pick even if we move up.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        I’d be fine with that. If you like a QB there is nothing wrong with taking him at #11. Trading multiple picks and all that stuff is what scares you. Maybe Rudolph is our wildcard and not Mayfield or Rosen that has been rumored. Just sit there and wait.

  5. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    Sitton signed his contract wearing a UCF shirt. I think he’ll be our first starter from UCF.

    Would love to get Shaquem!

  6. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    Based on what the stej gave up to go up 3 spots it looks like it might be too rich to try to go up.

  7. Son,
    C’mon man. If Rudolph had no cons he’d be one of the qb’s going in the top 5 or 6 picks. He’s got plenty.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Do share your cons. I’ve read that some of his issues are mechanical so he is a guy who needs some coaching and improvement in his game. But he has physical talent. Not a runner but can move a bit. I see him as a bigger Dak Prescott with less mobility.

      • He doesn’t have he arm strength of Prescott. He’s not got a gun. He throws a pretty deep ball but he’s late a lot on the deep outs and he’s got some accuracy and ball placement issues.

        He doesn’t read a defense particularly well and holds the ball a bit longer than I’d like to see. He can get wild and erratic at times and put the ball in a bad spot causing it to be tipped and intercepted.

        He’s a bit of a project. I’d say he’s a 3rd rd prospect at best and should be considered a developmental type player. He definitely shouldn’t be starting for anyone in his first year.

  8. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    MASON RUDOLPH

    BOTTOM LINE Pocket quarterback with good size who has shown consistent improvement as a passer. Rudolph is more of a downfield, play-action passer than a quarterback who can win with precision and arm strength. He’s a capable field reader who has the ability to operate with timing which will be important since his arm can be dull at times. Rudolph could be an early backup with the potential of becoming an average to below average starter in the league.

    http://www.nfl.com/draft/2018/profiles/mason-rudolph?id=2559942

  9. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    I don’t know that Rudolph fits what Gase wants. He’s big and tall, but he’s not very good on the move.

  10. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    I guess I didn’t say that clearly but I wasn’t saying he didn’t have any cons and I was trying to infer that the ones he has don’t worry me too much. He’s not going to a running QB and hasn’t played any pro style offense but I like his arm for the NFL.

  11. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    I don’t think Rudolph is a 1st rounder or some one you trade up for

    Solid QB but I do t really think I he’s a guy you build your franchise around

  12. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Glad you guys are finally talking about Mason Rudolph. As some of y’all know, I’m pretty high on him… I can see him sneaking into the mid-late 1st round. The Stealers* are showing MAJOR interest in him (eventual replacement for Big Ben), along with a few other teams.

    Yes, he got his warts (they all do), but there’s a lot to like about Rudolph. I watched some of his games around Thanksgiving, and I came away thinking that he’s probably got the prettiest looking deep-ball of this class… the dude can drop dimes and he’s got plenty of arm-strength.

    If we’re dead-set on getting the best QB we can without trading an entire Draft class away by moving up to get one of the “Big 4 QBs”, Rudolph is a likely target.

    I’m not sure I like the idea of drafting him @ R1P11, but if we have conviction in him, pull the trigger then… don’t trade down and have either of the Bills, Cardinals, or Stealers* taking him from us.

  13. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    So M you’ll have to hate your fave can you do it?

  14. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  15. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    My Peyton Manning comparison wasn’t that Rudolph is Manning, just that Gase’s best success was with a tall pocket passer, not a mobile Tannehill type.

  16. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    Pouncey visiting Chargers today

  17. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    son of a son of a shula says:
    March 18, 2018 at 7:01 pm
    So M you’ll have to hate your fave can you do it?
    ————
    If he’s playing for the Patsies*, yes… I CAN.

  18. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    We might be able to take the first corner off the board at 11 or someone may want to trade there to do so.

  19. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Edmunds, Smith, Ridley or Guice among others
    I take all those guys before Rudolph

    And I’m not touching Jackson
    Not until the 3rd
    His accuracy is about as bad as a prospect’s accuracy

    Good for him – he doesn’t want to switch to WR
    Now complete some passes

    If the qbs are off the board
    Fuck them
    Get the bpa at 11 at any position

    Those guys aren’t even scratching the surface of bpa

    Honestly all the qbs in this draft aren’t very good

    The facts that qbs might go 1-4 means that there’s a good chance the same teams are picking top 4 for a few more years…lol

  20. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    HUGHES, MIKE* CB 5’10” 189 Central Florida

    He’s a little short for what we’ve been going after?

  21. here’s something to think about. if the Phins decide to ride Tannehill this year and they don’t like what they see there shouldn’t be a lot of competition for a qb in the first next year after this draft.

  22. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    Was that a visitation of the most unholy? Damn! Good to see you Bat. The PB solutes you.

  23. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    I would be very happy with this.

    YOUR TEAM
    MIAMI DOLPHINS
    YOUR PICKS
    1: R1P11 DL MAURICE HURST MICHIGAN
    2: R2P10 G WILL HERNANDEZ UTEP
    3: R3P9 TE DALLAS GOEDERT – SOUTH DAKOTA STATE
    4: R4P23 QB LUKE FALK WASHINGTON STATE
    5: R4P31 RB JOHN KELLY TENNESSEE
    6: R6P35 FB DIMITRI FLOWERS OKLAHOMA
    7: R7P9 CB KAMRIN MOORE BOSTON COLLEGE
    8: R7P11 TE RYAN IZZO FLORIDA STATE

  24. Ken's avatar Ken says:

    LOL at Bat and the HDS reference

  25. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Lou, Prescott doesn’t beat teams with his arm. He’s one of those intangible QBs. I think Rudolph might be a guy like that.

    I think if you need a QB maybe you go there 1st rd, if you have a guy you’re rolling with maybe not so much. So many options. 😉

    • well, Prescott has his running ability as well. he scored 6 td’s rushing last season. Rudolph isn’t going to give you that. But, again, my comp for Rudolph is Bryce Petty. Personally, I don’t think he should go before the 3rd rd. I don’t see him ever being a starter for a team and if I’m Miami he’s a waste of a pick for my team.

  26. Ken's avatar Ken says:

    Mason Rudolph – meh

  27. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  28. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    wyoming85 says:
    March 18, 2018 at 7:22 pm
    HUGHES, MIKE* CB 5’10” 189 Central Florida

    He’s a little short for what we’ve been going after?
    ————-

  29. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Carrie Fisher was such a BEAUTIFUL looking woman. It’s truly saddening how drugs and alcohol took over her life at such a young age. Life in the ‘fast-lane’ isn’t all it’s cracked up to be for all too many.

    RIP, Carrie

  30. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    Good Luck Herd!!!
    Hope your Marshall Thundering Herd keep on dancing!!!!!!

  31. olddolphan's avatar olddolphan says:

    CONTINUED GOOD LUCK, HERD!! – – Just turned off the TV to go to bed. Marshall’s leading West Virginia 16-8!!!!! When I get up around 6:45, I expect to be reading about how Marshall KICKED WEST VIRGINIA’S ASSSSSS!!! –Best of luck to yer boyz!!

  32. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    Sitton’s wife and her family are huge Dolphin fans

  33. D's avatar D says:

    I actually see Rudolph pretty much in same light as another former OK State QB, Brandon Weeden, minus the drawing of social security when he enters the league.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I think he has the potential to be special and will probably be r BpA if he is there at 11

      But I think Lou is onto something with the Ridley pick
      The FO claiming the defense was built to play with the lead jumps out at me
      Also adding Quinn, resigning Hayes and hanging onto to Wake

      I don’t think the FO thinks they need to add a LB and instead would rather add talent at the skills position.

      A draft where we went
      1 Ridley
      2 TE or RB (Gesicki if he is there)
      3 RB or TE (I think Chubb or Freeman might be available in the 3rd)

      Wouldn’t surprise me
      I think part of this also means Parker is traded (for peanuts basically)

      That said – I would love to add Edmunds

      I just think some of the moves in the offseason lead me to believe they won’t go defense early in the draft and instead will look to add playmakers

  34. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    JMO, but I think we’ve done a good job of surrounding Tannehill with weapons ever since Gase arrived. However, one of the biggest problems has been opting for an aged TE that was past his prime or concussed.

    And when ya think about it, Tannehill and Cutler still targeted Jarvis as often as they did, limiting the touches other playmakers could get… and part of that was a turnstile O-Line.

    That said, I’m not so sure replacing DeVante will have (or would have) any kind of positive consequence: get the O-Line fixed and get a stud TE.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      Well Devante has been a disappointment

      The acquisitions of Sitton and the center are intended to fix the OL
      I don’t think they are going to take a TE at 11 – I suspect the 2nd or 3rd round are more likely to be the spot for a TE – so that is what Ridley at 11 makes sense
      it would be one thing if Nelson is on the board
      but he won’t be

  35. D's avatar D says:

    I wouldn’t add Edmunds over Roquan Smith, though i do think either of them would be worthy of pick 11.

    I also think Ridley would be a nice selection, but i just dont see adding him after putting so much emphasis on WR in FA. Now if, as Piggy was saying, we arent done at WR (ie we are looking to trade Parker), then i could see us targeting Ridley, which is a Cooper clone with better speed.

    Id prefer not to add a RB early in the draft, and it seems with interest in Murray we also aren’t looking to go early in the draft for one. I could see us adding a guy day 3 though. If we cant negotiate a cost effective deal with a guy like Murray, or some other vet FA, we might have Rb higher than day 3, but im really not expecting day 1.

    I still feel we are very much looking at a QB for our pick and i think they would trade up if they have to. I think though they aren’t going to be making moves before the draft to move us, so i think they are going to watch how that situation plays out and if they feel they need to trade up it will be a draft day decision.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I really don’t think Murray is going to affect what they are doing in the draft
      They are already asking him to come in for less $ than other teams are likely to offer him

  36. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Remember: this is a contract year for DeVante. I doubt we part ways with him being he’s probably going to be fighting for his future in football $$$. I’d be willing to bet he balls this year and is healthy.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I think it’s always been about injuries with him. When healthy he produced.

    • He doesn’t want to work to earn it

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      That’s exactly why they may trade him
      to get value for him now rather than letting him go via free agency

      Parker looked good for about the first 5-6 games this season
      then he was injured and then when he came back he did very little

      Is that little window enough for the team to have faith in him

      I don’t think anyone is saying with just another year – Parker will prove himself

      I’m not saying he can’t be better, but I’m saying that’s not a good bet

  37. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    Now with Cousins signed, looks like we created the biggest name free agent in play by cutting Suh. He’s being checked out by among others the Titans, Saints, Rams and Seahawks. Him on the Rams would make for one nasty D front.

  38. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Interesting…

  39. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I think drafting a WR would be a real bummer for me. I can’t think of a position I want to draft less that WR with our 1st pick. Damn, I hate the thought of it. Even if Parker is just Peter Parker like usual, and not Spiderman, I still don’t want a WR. We have Stills, Parker, Albert, Amendola, Grant and Carroo, and even possible Owusu and Ford. I know Carroo is possibly goners, but maybe they give him one more chance and he finally wakes the F up. Please don’t draft Ridley!

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      We could definitely roll with the WRs we have and add a TE to the offense to make it more dynamic.

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        we sure can

        I’m just reading the moves so far

        my preference is a LB if Edmunds and Smith are there

        But I’m reading the moves we made and seeing the argument for a Ridley

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      Once you let Landry go the makeover began

      In terms of Carroo – that isn’t a guy you bank on – forget Carroo or Oswus or Ford in terms of looking at the WR as complete. You let those guys come to camp and prove it and then they have to prove it during the season as well. There is room for at least one of them on the roster – but they still have a lot to prove, so no one should hang their hat on any of them

      Grant has had limited production and the team might like his speed but I think he is at best #4

      I think the team is happy with Stills. I know I personally like what he brings, but he isn’t a guy who is going to catch 70+

      Albert and Amendola might be very productive in the slot – I look at them as a as a combined addition to help replace Landry even if they are both on the filed at the same time

      which takes me to Parker. what is Parker at this stage of his career? He is a leap of faith to an offensive coordinator IMO.

  40. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Hey-hey-hey, I’m FAAAAAAAAAAAAST Albert!

  41. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    We have 11 WRs on the roster. We could add another WR but it doesn’t have to be the 1st rd or Ridley.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      We don’t need any

      This isn’t a prediction on need
      I just think Lou might be right on what the FO is thinking

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Yeah and I agreed with Lou yesterday about it as an option. Like I said it doesn’t have to be 1st rd for a WR. Could be TE 2nd and WR 4th. That’s still bolstering the passing game options and then there is what we do at RB. One thing for sure is our offense will not be the same.

      • Of course, I could be wrong. I just can’t ignore the lackluster offense we’ve had in Gase’s first two years and there’s been plenty said about how unhappy he’s been with the inability to move the ball and score.

        I also don’t know if Ridley would definitely be the pick at #11 but I just don’t think we can discount him in the conversation. We all kind of ignored the biggest need the team has and THAT IS to move the ball better on offense and score more points. There is no bigger need right now.

        And, if you look at him and the remainder of the wr class it’s night and day. He’s in his own zip code. There is nobody later that can give you close to what he does.

  42. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    Can’t be proud of the pick, but at least our trade to get to #3 was a lot more cost efficient than the Yets.
    ————————–
    “To get pick No. 3, the Jets gave up pick No. 6, pick No. 37, pick No. 49 and a second-round pick next year.

    The last time a team moved up to the third overall pick was in the 2013 NFL draft, and that team gave up a whole lot less. That year, the Dolphins got pick No. 3 from the Raiders, giving up only pick No. 12 and pick No. 42.”

  43. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    pheloniusphish says:
    March 19, 2018 at 2:28 pm
    If Allen is there at 12, Miami is taking him.
    ————-
    100% agreed, Phelon.

  44. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Tim – Matz is pitching great today, he’s into the 6th inning, and he struck out the last 6 Astro hitters until Carlos Correa just doubled, but he has been fun to watch today

  45. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    If edmunds is there at 11 they should run to the podium.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      I think it’s possible, especially if 4 QB’s go

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      A good prospect will be there for us if we stay at #11. If we trade down there will still be a good prospect, just a different level but if you add a pick or two you have more firepower to move up in the 2nd and 3rd rd if you covert a guy. Lots of options.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      If I had to put odds on it at this time, I’d say 70/30 we take a DT.

      • mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

        I think it all depends on how the top-10 pans out.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Tim Knight says:
        March 19, 2018 at 12:27 pm
        The actual draft is going to be interesting for sure specifically within the top 10. Then from there it will settle down to more normal.

      • mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

        Right! So I’m not so sure I’d put odds on ANYTHING. 🙂

  46. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Alain Poupart @apoupartFins
    .@Michael31Thomas is visiting the Pittsburgh Steelers today.

  47. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    M13, I said if I had to put odds on it “at this time”, I’d say 70/30 we take a DT. I think the QBs are going top 4 or 5 so my comment takes that into account. It’s just a comment about my gut feeling right now. It could change.

  48. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    After the jests I’ll advised trade up
    I’m pretty sure a real good prospect will be there at 11

    Defensively: Edmunds, Smith, Fitzpatrick, James and Vea are in play. Not all of them will be there byt at least one will

    Offensively I think Ridley, one of the top 4 QBs and Guice are in play but I suspect the qbs will all be gone

    I do t think there is an OL prospect owirh taking at 11 other than nelson who will be gone. Maybe Hernandez but I think that’s a reach

    In terms of are I think that’s the biggest need. If they love one they don’t want to miss on, them go for it at 11 – but I’m thinking 2nd or 3rd round will nab you that good one

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      So basically if we sit at 11 I think it’s

      Edmunds, Smith, Fitzpatrick, James, Vea, Ridley or Guice

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        I’ll buy that for a dollar! 4 QBs, Barkley, Chubb and Nelson, there’s only 3 more that can go before us.

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        Right – so one of the LBs, probably Fitzpatrick and then I don’t know the 3rd but that still leaves some good players

  49. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

  50. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    If the OTs were better in this draft than I think the possibility of drafting one to play at OG and replace James in 19 would also be there

    But the OTs just aren’t very good in this draft

  51. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    11: R1P11 QB JOSH ALLEN, WYOMING
    42: R2P10 TE MIKE GESICKI, PENN STATE
    73: R3P9 S JESSIE BATES, WAKE FOREST
    123: R4P23 LB JEROME BAKER, OHIO STATE
    131: R4P31 RB JOHN KELLY, TENNESSEE
    209: R6P35 DL KENTAVIUS STREET, NORTH CAROLINA STATE
    227: R7P9 OT K.J. MALONE, LSU
    229: R7P11 CB KAMERON KELLY, SAN DIEGO STATE

  52. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    I forgot to factor in Denzel Ward

    I don’t think cb is a option for us, but he might be the bpa if he is there at 11

    I wouldn’t love that pick

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Isn’t he considered a guy who can play all over in the secondary?

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        I’ve barely looked at him

        This is what nfl com says

        Ward has the experience and talent to handle duties on the outside, but his lack of play strength combined with his elite footwork might be the deciding factor for a move inside. Ward is outstanding as a mirror-and-match cornerback with great route feel who is able to maintain tight coverage around the field with good technique and pattern recognition. He should become an early starter at nickel cornerback with the talent to make an immediate impact for a defense that faces a pass-happy division foe twice per year.

  53. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Piggy, there is usually a surprise pick as well.

  54. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    GBN Draft Report
    1. Cleveland Sam Darnold QB Southern California
    2. NY Giants Josh Rosen QB UCLA
    3. NY Jets (from Indianapolis) Josh Allen QB Wyoming
    4. Cleveland (from Houston) Bradley Chubb DE North Carolina State (or Barkley)
    5. Denver Baker Mayfield QB Oklahoma

    This could go down like this. Especially with Denver and Mayfield. Similar size and game to Keenum. Good situation to build your offense around both. Mayfield can learn behind Keenum and if Keenum struggles whenever you go to Mayfield. That’s a good situation for Denver.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      are the browns going to take Chubb after they took a pass rusher last year

      I think Barkley is there pick
      If the rest is true than you know the first 6 picks
      Chubb goes 6 to the Colts

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Chubb is a highly rated pass rusher. Nothing wrong with having more than one. They also signed Carlos Hyde and have Duke Johnson. I know Barkley is special but so is Chubb. That’s why I put Barkley as another option, that wasn’t GBN.

  55. I think that Albert Amendola kid is going to be special.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      LOL, if Amendola comes close to playing like he did next year that’s a bonus. You probably pencil him in for 12-14 games optimistically. Wilson being a young guy on the rise adding another speed element to the offense, fits what we’ve been talking about all offseason. Gase wants to be explosive in all phases and not roll with 2-3 players that were not explosive enough. You can’t just do 3-5, 6-8 yards all day without breaking big plays. Ajayi broke a lot of big plays in 2016 in a few games, but not so much in 2017 during the time he was here. Then there is all the other stuff we all know – they moved on. Same with Landry.

      There is no #1 anymore. Everyone on the field do your job and when you get it make a play. That’s what I think we’re building here.

  56. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    The roster will only be as good as the coaching using it. Gase and his staff needs to step it up.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Agreed, and I think Gase knows that and that’s why he made some changes to the staff. It’s a two-phase revamping in both coaching and personnel. The defense was revamped over the last two years. The group we have now have not played a lot of games together and it’s a new group. This year we’re seeing that on offense.

      When people talk about rebuilding, that starts with a new HC. That doesn’t mean everyone goes, but there is going to be significant turnover. When I hear people talk about we’re rebuilding as in blowing it up, that’s not accurate. Blowing it up is all big contracts go, you move on from twilight vets, you don’t trade for or sign vets at the same time. It sometimes seems like semantics but there is a difference.

      sb7, not saying you were saying anything about this necessarily, I was just rambling on about where we’re at and what it looks like we’re doing. LOL

  57. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    I can’t think of a position I want to draft less that WR with our 1st pick.
    MikeE, off the top of my head I can think of at least three.

    long snapper
    Punter
    kicker

    LOL

    I know you were just using Hyperbole.

  58. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    LOL, I can see it now……

    With the 11th pick in the 2018 NFL draft, the Miami Dolphins select……Tanner Carew, long snapper Oregon

  59. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    Give me some points for even knowing the name of a long snapper available in this year’s draft.

  60. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Lou and Piggy, when I watched Orlando Brown run the 40, I thought to myself well what do you think a guy built like that will run like? LOL

    Also when does he ever have to do a vertical lol? His job is to play contact at the POA, move or push guys away. He’s moving a couple of yards laterally and forward. He’s not leading blocks down the field. So I get why he’ll still be valued.

  61. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    Orlando Brown Action Figure

  62. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    That was hyperbole too Mike E. I can push it 10 times and then shit myself. LOL

  63. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    brown’s bench press was actually one of his better scores

    I mean it was almost a third of the top score but it was decent

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      Sorry just read an article about how bad it scores were and I stand corrected
      14 is the worst by an OL since 2000
      a 7th rounder drafted by the saints (who never appeared in one game) had 13 reps once

      his 40 time is the 3rd worst ever
      some guy posted a 6 second time in 2011 (he went undrafted and never played don’t he NFL)

  64. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  65. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    ————-
    Making FAR lesser than he would have, here in Miami.

  66. D's avatar D says:

    Yeah, Orlando brown had one of the worst combines i have seen since i have been watching it. I would not draft him.

    • because the underwear Olympics means more than the way the player actually plays the game on the field. lol

      • D's avatar D says:

        You cant do as badly as he did in all the skill assessments and be encouraged in him as a player.

    • D's avatar D says:

      I have been a person who has said the combine stats shouldnt be overblown, but there are things that you pay attention to, and underwhelming in all categories is something you cant ignore. I bet money if you want his tape well enough you see a lot of bad performances against top talent.

  67. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    When was Pouncey a hard nosed leader?

    • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

      Holding the bench down in 2016 and watching practice from sidelines last year. He was awesome.

    • D's avatar D says:

      Yeah im not sure the word leader is completely accurate. I think he might have been a veteran presence, but i dont think his character exuded leadership. I mean im probably more a fan than most here, but even i dont really feel he was a leader in the truest sense of the work, neither were Suh and Landy for that matter. Our team has very few true leaders, which is the bulk of our problems.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I think they meant a powder-nosed accomplice

      Honestly I think they don’t know the difference between the twins

  68. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    I’m not saying we should take Orlando Brown. Just saying why some teams may still value him.

  69. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    If you actually look at Brown’s tape, you wouldn’t be surprised at his combine performance. He’s a big guy. That’s about all he has going for him. There is absolutely nothing special about the way he plays. To me, he plays slow, casually, no aggression, no purpose to what he does. I’d question his desire more than anything else because he plays like he has none.

  70. D's avatar D says:

    ElephantRider says:
    March 19, 2018 at 5:45 pm

    And that’s enough for Landry to walk…..
    —————————————–
    Im not questioning the move, im just saying he didnt take a major paycut to play elsewhere and i think it shows the value we had on him isnt too far off market for a player of his caliber. Im ok with the move, i knew we would be moving on from him at least by the end of the year this year, and i felt there was even a good chance we would be moving on from him before the end of the year this year. Replacing him with a guy on a pretty equivalent production level at a savings to his cap hit was a good move, and kept us from running the risk of having to make that move in the middle of the year as a scramble to patch our OL yet again.

  71. D's avatar D says:

    Wilfork makes Brown look like a waif model and that dude moves like a cat. There are big dudes and there are fat asses, Brown is a fat ass.

  72. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    Maybe Mayfield made Brown look good.

  73. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Pretty amazing that Pouncey walked away from the Jonathan Martin thing unscathed in terms of his reputation

    It wasn’t like his name didn’t come up….a lot!

  74. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    So Pouncey signed for less than his old contract. Assuming his agent is capable, makes you wonder if he actually asked for a better deal or if it was just putting a good face on it.

  75. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    D

    Yeah it wasn’t major. Maybe that’s what the Phins wanted to restructure to and he found out that’s all he can get. Who knows? But I agree that he can be replaced cheaper. He is a walking time bomb….

  76. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Wow an Orlando Brown bashing session broke out. LOL

  77. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    DeMarco Murray visits and leaves without a deal. Probably looking for more $ options.

  78. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    It’s looking more and more as if they went to guys and offered them the opportunity to restructure or take a hike. It’s not sounding like they gave guys much wiggle room or cared much about keeping them.

  79. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    You had to know this story was coming at some point….only Q was when.

    “A self-driving Uber car hit and killed a pedestrian Sunday night in Tempe, Arizona….The vehicle was going 40 mph when it hit the pedestrian. There was no indication the car attempted to slow itself before the collision.”

  80. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    LOL @ Lou!

  81. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Can’t keep rolling with the same guys with the same results if you don’t think they’re a good fit. Gase is the HC and he is ultimately responsible for wins and losses. It’s his team to make or break. Big year in 2018 to show he knew what he was doing. The team will have a new look for sure with some familiar faces. I for one hope he’s right. 🙂

    • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

      If he isn’t, here we go again….

      What will it take tho? Playoff birth, playoff win, just a winning record?

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Competitiveness and a sign of upside. No worse than 8-8 but not an ugly 8-8 – could have been 11-5 with a play here or there. Not getting shutout and scoring 20 or less 11 times. But in that scenario it has to be playoffs at a minimum in 2019, not another we “just” fell short.

        However, if the team doesn’t look right and is worse than that in 2018, Gase is gone.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      The one thing for sure is that Gase (and maybe Tannebaum) are doing a whole bunch of move. And you are right that at this point it is their team…..time to put up or shut up. No excuses left.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        I don’t even look at it is excuses. If you as a HC took over a 6-10 team who the last time was in the playoffs was 2008, what were you expecting? Probably not a playoff birth year one after a 1-4 start. Last year a lot of stuff went wrong along with a roster turnover. That’s continued this offseason. If it doesn’t come together well we all know how that goes.

      • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

        What if there is 2 hurricanes, coach smoking crack, 2 QBs blow their knee, they pull Romo from the booth, Denney runs away during trip up to GB, and the RB they draft gets traded for a coupon at Ikea?

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        LOL ER….but will never happen like that. No way Denney ever lets the team down. 🙂

      • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

        We’ll see….maybe he loves sushi!

  82. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    What positions do you want to come out of this draft with that makes you feel we can be a good team in 2018? Keep it to three, not necessarily in order, just who pans out.

    • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

      DT, TE, LB

      • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

        Yeah I know I didn’t list OL. I’m feeling better about it.

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        Honestly I don’t that’s no there is any player in this draft that we can plug in and improve our OL except Nelson – and he will be gone before we pick

        Maybe Hernandez. I wouldn’t be upset about Hernandez
        Anyone else iMo is competing with our current roster and is probably more for the future and for depth than anything else

        I’m not surprised if we see Asiata next year remember how cautious Gase was with guys like Ajayi, Drake, Grant
        He’s not exactly throwing rookies into the fire

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      I think TE is a need

      My general feeling is I would like to have a theme

      So TE, WR, RB does that

      As does DT and LB

      So either TE, WR, RB
      Or TE, DT and LB

  83. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    I think they get at least two more years. The first two years were to evaluate the roster now they are building the roster they want.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Think all the moves mean that at least Gase is safe for two years. Not so sure about Tannebaum.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        That is with the perception that Tannebaum does everything on his own which is not the case. We have not been crazy with contracts since Grier became GM. I think he tempered T-Bomb into more value in the draft and bargain hunting through trades and FA. That doesn’t mean it always works, but you don’t go for the big FA all the time.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      If they have a bad year this year I’m pretty sure the finger gets pointed squarely at Gase

  84. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    In terms of Murray
    I’m not sure he doesn’t sign later
    I think Mando was right – they want him but they want him to take a bargain $

    If I was an NfL RB on the tail end of my career I would rather retire than accept a discount.

  85. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    I want a Looney Jersey!

    Your Picks:
    Round 1 Pick 11: Fitzpatrick, Minkah, CB/FS, Alabama (A)
    Round 2 Pick 10: Gesicki, Mike, TE, Penn State (A-)
    Round 3 Pick 9: Griffin, Shaquem, OLB, Central Florida (A+)
    Round 4 Pick 23: Falk, Luke, QB, Washington State (A)
    Round 4 Pick 30: Burks, Oren, OLB, Vanderbilt (A-)
    Round 7 Pick 5: Adams, Tony, OG, North Carolina State (A+)
    Round 7 Pick 11: Looney, James, DT, California (A+)

  86. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Piggy, if we don’t sign a significant RB in FA that ups the odds for a guy like Guice. Even 1st rd RBs you can keep 4-5 years and get their young years without the big contract. Drake/Guice is a nice combo.

    • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

      It would be a kick ass combo and Drake can be a factor on ST as well especially since they’ve hinted at Grant taken a lesser role on ST and Landry is gone

      Who’s going to return kicks and punts next year?

      Drake and Grant seem effective to me
      But if you start asking Grant to play more offensive snaps and drake to take more carries – is probably less effective

  87. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    I agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  88. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    Ebron to the Colts.

  89. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

  90. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    OK I’m done!!!!!! (for the night)

    Your Picks:
    Round 1 Pick 11: Smith, Roquan, ILB/OLB, Georgia (A)
    Round 2 Pick 10: Gesicki, Mike, TE, Penn State (A-)
    Round 3 Pick 9: Penny, Rashaad, RB, San Diego State (A)
    Round 4 Pick 23: Jones, Jamarco, OT, Ohio State (A+)
    Round 4 Pick 30: White, Mike, QB, Western Kentucky (A+)
    Round 7 Pick 5: Apke, Troy, SS, Penn State (A+)
    Round 7 Pick 11: Atkins, John, DT, Georgia (A+)

  91. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Piggy, if we land that TE we all talk about along with a good RB prospect in the draft I think we score the kind of points we want to see. WR is not the key at this point. The OL already looks better. Still has to prove itself. QB and OL.

  92. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    Just my opinion….

    Need that stud defensive player at pick 11. Whether it’s Vea or Smith/Edmunds. Also they still need a 3rd safety…..

  93. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    I know I lied!
    But it didn’t work out to bad with Guice in the first!

    Your Picks:
    Round 1 Pick 11: Guice, Derrius, RB, LSU (B-)
    Round 2 Pick 10: Gesicki, Mike, TE, Penn State (A-)
    Round 3 Pick 9: Griffin, Shaquem, OLB, Central Florida (A+)
    Round 4 Pick 23: McFadden, Tarvarus, CB, Florida State (A+)
    Round 4 Pick 30: White, Mike, QB, Western Kentucky (A+)
    Round 7 Pick 5: Adams, Tony, OG, North Carolina State (A+)
    Round 7 Pick 11: Webb, Damon, SS, Ohio State (A+)

  94. ElephantRider says:
    March 19, 2018 at 9:44 pm
    Better score some points…..because the D ain’t stopping anybody!
    +++++++++++++++++++

    That’s the whole problem. The offense hasn’t been scoring points. It average 22.7 ppg in yr 1 under Gase and 17.6 ppg last season. The already went heavy D in the draft. This is Gase’s draft. It’s going to be heavy offense.

    Wilson is a nice piece to the wr unit and Amendola could be valuable but he’s a short-term answer and could be a one year signing. Parker has yet to live up to his 1st rd status and then you have Stills and a bunch of others who are unproven.

    I can’t see Gase sitting around being patient with the offense anymore. If this offense doesn’t put some points up on the board this year, and I mean they need to really get up there, Gase is going to pop something.

    So, IMO, if Ridley is there at #11 don’t be surprised if he’s the pick. He’s a stud on the offensive side of the ball. Great speed but can run routes. Doesn’t need to slow down to make a cut and if you’re looking at his numbers from Alabama they don’t tell anything about what he’s capable of because he was underutilized at Alabama.

    If you want to see more points scored and the defense play better as a unit then hope for a heavy offensive draft.

  95. Again, and I can understand a lot of people looking at the defensive studs in this draft or thinking we need to take one of those DT’s high because we lost Suh, but what is the #1 thing that stands out about this team since Tannehill has been here?

    It’s the lack of the ability of the offense to move the ball consistently and score points. That’s the #1 thing. Since Gase has been the HC his offense hasn’t done any better and he’s supposed to be an offensive genius.

    So, why is it that everyone wants to see us take a defensive player in the first round? Is the defense going to score points? No.

    ER said “better score a lot of points because this defense isn’t going to stop anyone”. Well, if the offense isn’t moving the ball and keeps having the 3 and out’s we see year after year the defense definitely isn’t stopping anyone.

    And here’s the question. Why isn’t the defense stopping anyone? Because we lost ONE guy?

Leave a comment