2018 Season – Game 12 – Bills @ Dolphins

From memory, this is the spot where we’re usually facing playoff elimination.  Sometimes it’s the Bills, sometimes it’s the Ravens, but either way, we come out on the wrong side.  Adam Gase made sure that wasn’t an issue, so thank you Adam for leaving your balls in Davie, and thus sparing us all the usual heartbreak of a major clunker against the Bills.  Despite the records, the Bills are the team on the rise, while we slowly decay from mediocre to possibly sub-mediocre.

There has been much debate about Adam Gase, Ryan Tannehill, and the dynamic duo together as a pair, and while there are two sides to the debate, there’s not a soul on this blog that believes Ryan Tannehill is now, or can ever be on the same level as the best QB’s in the NFL, such as Drew Brees, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, Ben Roethlisberger, Russell Wilson, Phillip Rivers, or even newcomers to this group such as Patrick Mahomes and Jared Goff.  He’s not even close to those guys.  As far as Adam Gase is concerned, his ledger is incomplete, but he’s nearing the point of no return.  I’ll explain.

So much was made about the wonderful job Gase did in Chicago with QB Jay Cutler, and I think I’ve found something about his style.  I don’t think Gase should be known as “The QB Whisperer”.  That’s way too sexy for what Adam Gase does to his QB’s.  I’d call him “The QB  Programmer”.  The program is “BE CAREFUL!”

In 2014 w/o “The QB Programmer”, Jay Cutler threw for 3812 yards, 28 TD’s and 18 INT’s, a QBR of 88.6.  Gase became the Bears OC in 2015, and “The QB Programmer” was born!  No more pesky Peyton Manning telling him to STFU and let me do what I do, now I’m in charge here!  Let’s look at this amazing successful transformation of QB Jay Cutler in 2015.  Cutler threw for 3659 yards, 21 TD’s and 11 INT’s, a QBR of 92.3.

Seems to me that Adam Gase puts completion percentage and less turnovers as the hallmark of his programming algorithm.  Never mind scoring TD’s, in fact, safety first Mr. Quarterback, if you need to throw past 10 yards, you better damn well have a good reason for doing so!  I mean look at the stats of Jay Cutler here in Miami last year, in what looked liked a hideous, grotesque year for him.  He completed 62% of his passes, threw for 2666 yards, 19 TD’s and 14 INT’s in 14 games.  It’s all pretty similar.  Thinking of how many times Cutler threw off his back foot or just chucked it to the turf to avoid a sack, 62% isn’t all that bad. 

This past week in Indy was death knell for me for Gase.  He’s more interested in the appearance of the game, “Gee fellas, that was a close game against Andrew Luck on the road, we almost pulled it out”  What really happened was “Gee fellas, I’m sorry, we had a shot to upset Andrew Luck and the high flying Colts, but I went into a shell, my QB Programmer algorithm told me not to throw the ball past the sticks because, well, it’s dangerous you know, there are men on the other team just dying to take that ball away, and so you see, I took the safe route, and left it in the capable hands of our defense instead”. 

Soooooooooo, we play the Bills in what has now become basically a meaningless game.  The Bills threw up 41 points against the Jets, we just threw up against the Jets, hanging on for dear life with a 13-6 victory in a very painful game to watch.  The Bills defeated a demoralized Jaguars team, but still, a formidable defense for sure, but a team with about as much teeth in their offense as ours. It’s a damn shame, SB7 wants to get together this weekend, but dammit, I don’t have it in me to travel to NYC to watch this team play, not anymore.  I’d sooner meet up and go to McSorley’s Old Ale House, and see if we can deplete them of all of their delicious dark ale, rather than languish at Slattery’s, “The House of Horrors” for Dolphins fans hoping for a crucial win to make the playoffs. 

Tis a sad state friends, and I believe as long as Adam Gase is here (The QB Programmer), and good ole #17, Ryan Tannehill is here, there will be more of the same.  Hell, if I was Ryan Tannehill, I’d welcome the opportunity to compete for a starting job elsewhere, maybe he can have that Rich Gannon type of resurrection.

Anyway, wish I had more positive things to say, but alas, this past week and and frustrating loss has once again left me angry and unsatisfied with the Miami Dolphins.  By the way, I shit you not, I was watching SNY this morning, looking for some positive sports news about the New York Mets, and on the scroll line, I saw the Mets hired Adam Guttridge as Assistant GM for analytics, I saw the Adam G, and I was like “WTF is that, Mets hired Adam Gase!!!!!!!??????”  It got me ultra-pissed for just a millisecond, but that’s how i feel about Adam Gase right now.  I want him nowhere NEAR our rookie QB that we draft next season.  NOWHERE!!!!! 

For those of you who still enjoy the games, I salute you!  Bookman, I love ya man, I wish I could share what you feel, so please continue to bring it here so at least I could share a little of it still.  Even if I get a sliver of it, it will be better than not having any of it.  I admit, sports has made me bitter.  Losing, disappointing seasons are the norm across the board for me now, Dolphins, Mets and Knicks.  The hits keep coming, and I’m feeling like Glass Joe, ready to hit the canvas. 

GO DOLPHINS!!!!


This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,305 Responses to 2018 Season – Game 12 – Bills @ Dolphins

  1. D's avatar D says:

    ocalarob says:
    November 29, 2018 at 10:08 am

    Russel Wilson was picked in the 3rd round in 2012, luckily we picked up jonathon martin in the second, thank god we didn’t get Wilson then, we would have been reaching!
    ——————————————
    Reaching is subjective. Teams take players in the rounds they think they need to. By definition, them choosing to take that player in that round means that it wasnt a reach, its when they felt like they would be worth it to them.

    Also you dont know if something is a reach or not until you see the outcom of a player, so its also completely hindsight driven.

    We, as fans call things a reach. The talking heads call things a reach, teams dont call those picks reaches.

  2. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Gase had absolutely no head coaching experience and almost no direct coaching experience to speak of. Any hype surrounding him when he was hired was purely speculative. Nothing he’d done in the NFL up to that point even came close to being a HC, so there was no reason to think he could or couldn’t do it.
    ***
    I’m still torn on the guy but being a hot commodity in the coaching carousel means absolutely nothing when it comes to evaluating his performance. There have been tons of guys who were hot commodities who failed miserably.

  3. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    D – Would you want Gase to draft our future QB? Do you trust him with that?

    • D's avatar D says:

      I think i do. If you look at who they liked in the last draft they had it pegged pretty good. They liked Baker, then Allen, and then Rosen. They didnt seem interested in Darnold. IMO thats pretty much the order of those 4, as far as how they look this year. It may not end up being that at the ends of their careers but for now, just going off that i think their talent evaluation is there.

  4. D's avatar D says:

    Son those could have been lyrics to a song lol

  5. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Phillips can beat any guy we put out there at LG, if he wants to, and I think he wants to.

  6. D's avatar D says:

    Wyoming, are you talking about who, that WAS avialable or who that will be available becuse ive already given plenty of examples of FA’s nexxt year we could get for less than we save cutting Tanny that will give us as good or better QB play.

  7. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    I expect Phillips to very motivated Sunday. Eventually he will revert to the Phillips we know and get cut. But not this Sunday.

  8. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    I don’t want anyone’s leftover back up or project QB. If they move on from RT let them do it through the draft. And I don’t care if they do a Ditka…get the guy.

  9. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    Replacing the QB isn’t going to change the problems with Gase so you either give them both another year to see if Gase or both of them can improve or you start clean at the end of this year. Gase has some good qualities, but I think he takes on too much and maybe it’s because he’s not good at surrounding himself with the right people or he doesn’t trust them enough to do their jobs. Regardless, it’s several years in he still has the same issues.
    I feel like this front office is finally in the right place, regardless of what I or others feel about MTP, you have to look at the last few years and see how they’ve tried to build through the drafts and not sign terrible free agents. I think they’ve done a really good job, save for manage to grab a QB to replace or challenge Tannehill.
    The pieces of the defense are falling into place. We’ve got some great young talent in the skill positions. Solidify the o-line, get a few more pieces on defense, get a QB and a coaching staff who can get the most out of all of them.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      I wish I knew the truth about why Gase is so safe on offense. Is it Tannehill that he doesn’t want to expose, or is it just his nature? If it’s B, and not A, I don’t want him ruining any QB we draft with this offense.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        I think Gase played it conservative deep in our own end. Also that Tannehill is wearing a shoulder harness might be part of it. Who knows if Tannehill was experiencing some arm fatigue late in the game. The team isn’t going to put that out there though.

  10. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Bookman – Rumors say that your Brewers are interested in acquiring Noah Syndergaard from the Mets

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Do you want to trade Noah?

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        Very tough Tim, in the past I would think it would be ridiculous, but these days the way pitchers are used, basically 5-7 innings and out, if we got a nice package of top prospects back, I’d consider doing it, yes. Add in all the damn arm injuries pitchers get, I think in some ways it’s OK to have decent starting pitching and a great bullpen. Seems the way the sport is going, don’t you think?

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Yep, I hear ya.

  11. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Tim

    I don’t mean just this past game, which to me was absurdly safe, but in general. This is far from a wide open offense

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I’m not sure the offense we wanted to run ever got off the ground. Remember early on Tannehill was taking shots down the field and hitting on some of them. Then he went down and I think Gase was much more safe with Osweiler who is not accurate at all down the field. Then Tannehill in his first game back, it doesn’t seem like he’s 100%. I’m just speculating by the way.

  12. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I think you have to have at least 3 legit starting pitchers, because in the playoffs, that means a lot. If we traded Syndergaard, that leaves 1) Jacob deGrom, 2) Steven Matz, 3) Zack Wheeler

  13. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    we have 4 QBs on the roster right now, It doesn’t appear to me that Gase would want to draft a guy early with already having a full stable of QBs, most teams only carry 2 QBs

    • pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

      Stable full of broken do n nags. No Thoroughbreds, no Cracker cutting horses.

      • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

        they must have some value for him to keep them, look around the NFL, there’s a shortage of good QBs that are starting so a Nag may be a good thing

  14. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    if you really want a great potentially franchise QB you have to target him, how about the Alabama QB in 2020, trade down and trade the 1st this year and acquire a 1st next year in the deal. you will get that 1st at a discount, then next year you will have the ammo to get your targeted QB.

    Not sure if that guy is in this years draft and if he is it would cost too much for us to acquire.

  15. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    I like what Gruden is doing, that was a good move to trade Mack before the dead line, that’s when he would be most valuable.

    how many #1s does Oakland have this year? i think 3….and 2 next year

  16. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Stable full of QB’s eh? Just because they’re in the stable now doesn’t mean they’re worth more than a mound of dung in the hay

  17. D's avatar D says:

    I think the 2019 class of QB’s have players we should be looking at and we need to make an investment. Every year you find guys in the same boat as this one where you dont really know about them because you hear flaws on all of them. I think there are probably 3 that deserve to be considered 1st rounders, maybe 4. I mean legitimately good enough to g to a team and start the next year at some point, but with all of them it would be better if they had a year to acclimate to an NFL system. They could all learn on the job, there would just need to be some expectations that the first year might not be a blow the doors off success.

    There are a group that are going to need a full year at the least, but they are also good enough to become starters eventually and be upgrades over Tanny. I dont see a reason not to make a move next year in the draft, cut Tanny and get a stand in guy, like a McCown or Fitzpatrick, veterans who understand the game a good bit better than Tanny that could help the rookie transition. We could get either of them for less than 13mil. We could get Bridgewater too and not only get a pretty good transition guy, but someone who might also fit our system and make the rookie a plus, one of them becoming trade bait.

    I dont think any of the moves we can do, preclude drafting a guy next year and i seriously hope we dont waste another damn year before starting this rebuild project.

  18. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    LOL @ D – If any of them have value and some team would like to trade for one of them, I’d be more than happy to oblige

  19. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    I’d be down with a rookie or 2 and signing Bridgewater. I also think it would be the same as keeping RT17 for 1 more year. But if cutting him and signing another average guy makes everyone happy, so be it.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      It wouldn’t be the same because it wouldn’t be staying with the same old thing and expecting different results. We might not be much better, but it’s more likely we’d be better with a change than not changing anything. It certainly would bring some hope.

    • D's avatar D says:

      At thispoint Fitzpatrick is significantly better than Tanny. He isnt an elite QB but he is an upgrade and he is really football smart and could help a rookie transition. McCown is a pretty smart QB, those guy just werent giften with elite ability but they do pretty well with what they got. Both of them are smart QB’s who know how to play.

  20. D's avatar D says:

    I find it funny that people are like “im happy to see Caroo is salvaging his career” WTF are they seeing? He has 2 friggin catches and 3 total targets in 4 games since they brought him up.and the one last week was on a busted play.

  21. D's avatar D says:

    I personally feel Bortles has more upper end ability as a passer than Tanny too, but i wouldnt want him because he hasnt shown that that ability is doing anything more than Tanny is doing. He’s probably damaged goods by now and wont bounce back.I wouldnt want he or Winston.

  22. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    Fitzpatrick? LOL. OK

    Now it’s just anything is better. I get it.

    • D's avatar D says:

      How can you say he isnt better? His performance have been better. Their OL is pretty shitty too. He knows what to do with the ball and when to do it. He doesnt have the physical talent of Tanny but he is a more skilled QB for sure.

      • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

        He knows like throwing 5 INTs and 0 TDs last 2 games he played before being benched again. That’s been his career. Couple big games and then stinker after stinker.

      • D's avatar D says:

        Thats why he is a transitional QB, he isnt the solution to the QB problem, he’s a stand in until there is a solution. I dont expect any situation we have at QB next year is going to be playoff talk type stuff. Next year is going to be a rebuild year.

      • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

        Rather see one of these older vets come in and coach rather than play. If next year is already written off as failure, might as well get playing time for the new kid on the block.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        He’s 36, but guess that adds up to transitional.

  23. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    A lot of people bash lawyers…. feel like bashing dentists today after my visit. Everything is sell, sell, sell, including bringing out the hard press woman who checks exactly what your insurance will pay for. Which is apparently the key to what you need.

    Can I say what is needed or not?….No, but the game is clear. Smoking gun was when the doc said “we need to take pictures to figure out what to do.” Looked at him and said “did the full set you are looking at two months ago…why do you need more?” He had nuttin as he gave a look like a dog who had been caught tearing up the garbage.

  24. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    My last dentist was awesome. Sucks that I’ll have to find a new one now that I’ve moved.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      As tough to find as an honest mechanic. Ask people who they use. And if the answer starts with “my friend, brother, cousin or sis-in-law’s best friend” downgrade the rec.

  25. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    I’ll give you Wilson as a better middling QB than Tanny.
    But you can’t say with a straight face that he’s more than middling.

    Come on Son you come with Brisset? That’s not even worth thinking about?????????

    Look Tanny is who he is and who he’s always been!

    I want to upgrade too!!!!!!!!!!!!

    but I want to make sure it’s an upgrade! Not another 8-8 Non-closer!!!!!!!!!!!

    I’d list the names of the QB’s from Marino to Tanny!

    But the only break from throwing up, is Herds Noodle Arm! 😉

  26. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    I’m talking anybody!
    Draft?
    FA?
    Figure out a trade?

    I’m open for any “upgrade”!!!!!!!!

  27. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Wyo – Tell me you’re not serious about Wilson. He is light years better than Tannehill, he’s a top 5 NFL QB

  28. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    ORob,
    To me, having 4 QBs suggests that they are not happy with who they have. Why keep 4 if you’re all in on a guy? I think Tanny’s health is probably a bigger issue but you don’t keep multiple guys at a position if you are really confident in your top guys. That’s where the old adage of: “If you have 2 QBs you don’t have 1.” comes from.

    • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

      Or maybe they are planning on losing Oswieler to a better contract with another team and are sorting out who should be the next back-up.
      I’m not sold on Gase being unhappy with Tannehill, or at least from what he is saying that doesn’t seem likely.

  29. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Tannehill has played 6 games this year and is 3-3, why are we ready to dump him? do you think that’s enough play to know he needs to go?
    5 games left, we shall see if he bounces back.

  30. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    ORob,
    Bounce back to what? The same QB who scores about 1.5 TDs a game his whole career? He’ll be playing this season out if he can stay healthy. The conversation is whether or not he’s the guy you want to move forward with. He is what he is. Is that good enough?

  31. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    Is Wilson better than
    Brady
    Rogers
    Mahomes
    Goff
    Bree’s
    ???????????????
    NOT top 5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

      Rothlesburger
      rivers
      luck
      “Superman” that ones for Son

      Wilson is top 10 probably?
      It’s arguable!!!!!!!!!!

      • son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

        Thanks and don’t forget my other favorite Deshaun although it’s early I’d take him over Wilson too. I wish they listened to me and went after him, I lament.

  32. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    Mike E
    Tell me what the fuck Wilson has done without that Defense???????

  33. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    son of a son of a shula says:
    November 29, 2018 at 8:07 pm
    Thanks and don’t forget my other favorite Deshaun although it’s early I’d take him over Wilson too. I wish they listened to me and went after him, I lament.
    ——————————————–
    So your saying Wilson is not top 10??????

  34. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    Brees, Rodgers, Brady, Big Ben, Wilson seems top 5 to me

  35. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    So I guess I’m wrong that the narrative here is about mostly about Tannehill and Gase. Oh and now dentists. LOL

  36. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    This year Mahomes and Goff may be ahead of Wilson, but throughout his career, Wilson is a top 5 QB. Name a WR or RB now on Seattle. Wilson is still having a great season

  37. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Look at the talent Mahomes and Goff have right now. Look at what Ben has had the last few years

  38. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Wilson is better than Rivers

  39. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    I think Wilson does more with less around him than almost any other QB. He’s had very, very average talent all around him on offense almost his whole career. He’s around the top 5ish. He’s also done it awhile, so I give him more credit than guys like Goff or Mahomes. Just me.

  40. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Tim/Wyoming,
    I said on offense. You named 3 players in 7 years. Lynch, definitely. Graham only really played with him for about 2 and a half years. Baldwin, meh. Decent…not great. So, really just one other upper echelon guy…..and lots of average to bad ones. His OLs have been horrible, so he gets the Tanny excuse. Lol

  41. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Randy, I would just like to know what above average talent has Tannehill had since you always said we didn’t have any? LOL

  42. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    Don’t get me wrong!
    I like Wilson’s Grit and fire!!!!!!!!!!

    But I don’t see him getting more polish with experience?????

    still just running around making plays!

  43. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Tim,
    I don’t think I said Tanny has played with above average talent, but I’m watching hockey and football while I post.

  44. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Tim Knight says:
    November 29, 2018 at 1:09 am
    M13, what happened to not addressing the OL and all that? Now it’s all about Gase dink and dunk? Interesting! So now you throw deep all day with a sub par OL do ya? Just wondering how to do that new math. LOL
    —————-
    You lost me on this post, and I’m not trying to be a d!ck at all, man: I’m honestly confounded.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I was JJ/BB because you always had concerns about our OL yet you want to see us be a sling it offense instead of Gase’s dink and dunk. That doesn’t add up.

  45. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Jaylon Smith is turning into an NFL STUD.

  46. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    Tannehill’s talent had nicknames too.

  47. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Tim,
    Actually, that isn’t what I said. My comment was more nuanced than that. Lol

  48. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Tim,
    It just struck me. When I say average, you can just think Tannehill. That pretty much explains it. Lol

  49. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Tim,
    I’m not sure where you live but football fans typically spend a lot of time talking about their QB. You act like it’s out of the ordinary when it’s not. I’m happy to talk about the OL for the 10,000th time too if you’d prefer.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I mentioned something about talent around a QB and you said average is Tannehill. The entire discussion on this blog is about Tannehill, Tannehill, Tannehill and he did not play poorly in the Indy game. Then everyone blames Gase for playcalling at the end of the game and then back to replacing Tannehill. You don’t see a hint of monotonous? Then I get told that isn’t what happens here. LOL

  50. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    Bitches

  51. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Tim,
    This whole blog gets monotonous in our topics. You know that. You are just a fan of Tanny don’t like the negativity. When people are pimping him, I don’t see you saying it’s getting old and complain that we should talk about something else. That’s fine, but you know as well as I do that we repeat the same damn conversations around here over and over again. Lol

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      It has nothing to do with me being a fan of Tanny and don’t like the negativity. I’ve said many times I’m all for drafting a QB and if we move on from him I’ll root for the next guy. Which gets ignored anytime I say that like it never happened.

      But monotonous is monotonous. I mean it’s like a mentally ill person banging their head on the wall over and over. It’s the same thing over and over and over. The blog has become Home. LOL

  52. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    Son – Got word today. Won Punta Gorda. 2 bottles of Cristal into the win party.

  53. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Tim Knight says:
    November 29, 2018 at 9:30 pm
    I was JJ/BB because you always had concerns about our OL yet you want to see us be a sling it offense instead of Gase’s dink and dunk. That doesn’t add up.
    ————-
    It goes back to Gase’s now infamous statement in the offseason (paraphrasing, not a direct quote): ‘the QB will have the ball out of his hand in under 2.x seconds, we don’t need to have a beast O-Line in pass-pro’.

    What doesn’t add up is what Gase is doing. Neglect the O-Line (pass-pro being the focus in this instance), then one MUST get rid of the ball so quickly (2.x seconds)… hence Gase’s dink-n-dunk Offense.

    This demonstrates that the plan all along was to play dink-n-dunk with Tannehill this year… as opposed to when Tanny looked really good back in ’16 for a stretch, before his knee injuries (note the PLURAL of “injuries”).

  54. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Who’s been playing in place of my MAN LT Terron Armstead? Yeah… that guy that a certain someone here always dissed: Jermon Bushrod.

    Jermon has been kicking AZZ for the Saints at LT!!! I feel really good for our former Phin! We probably should have re-signed him.

  55. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Vander Esch is making a SERIOUS case for DROY!

  56. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Tim Knight says:
    November 29, 2018 at 10:18 pm
    You forget the deep passes before he went down?
    ————-
    No sir, I do not. I felt as though Tanny was developing VERY well in ’16… ESPECIALLY his deep ball. But unfortunately, our O-Line has only gotten weaker (in pass-pro), injuries have occurred (both to our O-Line and to Tanny’s throwing arm), and Tanny isn’t seeing a wide-open Kenny Stills anymore.

    Did ya hear what Stills had to say today?

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I was talking about this year.

      Yes I heard what Stills had to say today which speaks to the 10 different OL we have started this year. That is why we dink and dunk now. Tanny has played one game with Stills the last 6 games. Osweiler couldn’t hit anyone deep.

      • mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

        Bro, whatever the hell we’re doing on Offense, it ISN’T WORKING. And I’m not talking about this last game against the Colts… I’m talking about the whole of this ’18 season. Actually, I’m talking about Gase since he took over in ’16.

        I showed y’all this last evening: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/mia/index.htm

        Gase’s Offense isn’t working, and it’s not even as good as it was in ’14 with Philbin/Lazor with Tanny as our QB.

  57. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    I saw NO throw a bubble screen on 3rd and 10!! LOL

  58. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    M13, Tannehill, Moore, Cutler, Moore, Fales, Tannehill, Osweiler. Think about that.

    • mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

      And none of them took us to the ‘promised land’. NEXT MAN UP.

      Carson Wentz went down and Nick Foles took the Eagles to the ‘promised land’ just last year. Our Bob Griese went down in ’72 and what happened?

      I told management to sign Case Keenum before he blew up into an NFL starter… what happened? We could have signed him for $910K, Brother.

      NO MORE EXCUSES.

      • mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

        Oh… that was to sign Case Keenum as a mere backup to Ryan Tannehill.

        My record stands for itself.

        NO MORE EXCUSES.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        Oh okay. If only you were HC all would be just fine. I mean really, man? The Broncos are 5-6.

        Gase has had to use 5 QBs over 2+ seasons, not two.

  59. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    M13, did Philbin and Lazor ever have a winning record and make the playoffs?

    • mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

      You’re not taking into account the bad Defenses that Philbin had… and that’s on the HC, Philbin. Same thing here as it applies to Gase, if you want to blame a HC’s Defenses.

  60. mf13ss's avatar mf13ss says:

    Tim Knight says:
    November 29, 2018 at 11:11 pm
    …Gase has had to use 5 QBs over 2+ seasons, not two.
    —————
    Then I’d say that either Gase has fragile QBs, or he’s not protecting his QBs enough via a strong, pass-pro O-Line.

    NO MORE EXCUSES

    I’m seeing bad trends being set.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Okay… Tannehill got hurt, Gase called out to Cutler, Moore and the rest are backups. Fragile QBs? You sure about that?

      Our OL has had no fortune staying healthy since like 2010, I’ve lost track. LOL

  61. C’mon man. I wasn’t the only one who dissed Bushrod and you know that when he played in Miami he couldn’t block for shit.

  62. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Tanny ranks 15th in the NFL with passer rating of 97.2

  63. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    play calling options are more limited without Wilson and Grant.

  64. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    2018 is a wash because of the injuries. 2019 Gase will be on the hot seat.

  65. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    can you find a better qb for 13 mil? i doubt it. Tannehill isnt going anywhere, Ross likes him and so does Gase. in fact they may extend his contract to acquire some cap relief.

    • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

      Yeah…yeah…the little bitch rec throwing his team-mates under the bus. I have seen Stills shy away from contact, he could be cut start of the league year at a 3 mil hit on the cap.

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        While I don’t agree with players doing that, doesn’t it seem like there are quite a few current dolphins and former Dolphins who have said things like that? Since Stills insulted wonderboy, he’ll be sent packing too. We’re going to run out of players to cut

      • Stick up for a worthless qb and diss a guy who is underutilized because that worthless qb can’t see the field

  66. BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

    D, come on man. I agree with a lot of what you say and like your input on players and I agree that Tannehill is an average starting QB. But, come on man, Bortles is better than Tannehill? I have to disagree on that one.

  67. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Wyo

    You pick the criteria for a QB, WIlson is probably top 5-10 for most of them, and some of the most important criteria like TD’s and INT’s, and passer rating, he’s right there almost every year. It would be exhausting to put up all the links, but you can find it on either NFL.com, or pro-football-reference.com. I’m not putting him anywhere where he isn’t. Do some research instead of just going by what you “think” he is. Add in his rushing yards and TD’s from those as well, and he surpasses most of the QB’s you mentioned. If you want to go by W/L, he’s at the top there too, although I don’t personally believe QB’s should have that stat attached to them.

  68. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Are we really paying Tannehill $26M next year if we keep him and don’t restructure? That’s over a million per TD. Totally worth it. Can’t wait.

  69. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Tim – What do you think of that big trade that’s possible going down with the Mets and Mariners?

    Reportedly, Mets trade Jay Bruce, Anthony Swarsak, 2018 1st RD pick Jarred Kelenic (#3 Mets prospect), RHP Justin Dunn (#4 Mets prospect), and RHP Gerson Bautista

    Mets get OF Robinson Cano, and closer Edwin Diaz

    It’s creative, but how many times have we seen great older players come here and flop, like Robbie Alomar, Carlos Baerga, Mike Bordick, Todd Frazier etc etc

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I don’t enough about our prospects and I didn’t realize Canó was 36. Jay Bruce makes sense for an AL team because he can DH there. I don’t know, what do you think about it?

  70. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    Why assume Stills was going after Tanny? He’s only been back one game after 6 games out.

  71. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    stanger,
    What is he actually paid next year, I guess including his guaranteed money that’s spread over the contract, if that’s how it works? Is that the $26M?

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      $26 mil is his cap number for next year. His cap number for this year is like $9 mil. But part of that is cause he got a lot paid up front to lower his cap this year. Real money and cap money don’t always match up.

  72. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    MikeE,
    I’m not a capologist. I don’t even know what dead cap money is. Lol

  73. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Stanger – I’m not worried about it, but to say that Tannehill is here no matter what because of the $13M cap hit doesn’t make sense to me. You still have $13M to work with, and if you can find someone better or as good for less, why not?

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Who knows what will happen, but am not someone saying Tanny here no matter what. Just not one of those he is gone for sure folks. If the actual cost was $26 mil would be different.

      BTW — you have one nice team going in the Toba league, which checked cause we are playing. Good luck.

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        Thanks – Good luck to you as well. Bad start with Michael Thomas. I have MT in my money league, he’s hurt me the last couple of weeks. 2 very small games for him.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        Not like Ingram lit it up for me. Only played him instead of Drake cause he was going on Thurs. Drake went IA and had no one. Hope he Kenyan makes me look like a fool.

  74. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    I’m remembering why I don’t pay attention to contract crap. Lol

  75. Randy's avatar Randy says:

    Stills needs to shut the hell up but that’s not how these whiny little douchebags work in the NFL now. That said, he’s not saying anything that hasn’t been said before. We all know he was really ripping the OL anyway. Lol

  76. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    Stills went back to media room to reiterate his comments. He wanted to make sure it was clear he wasn’t talking about one guy.

  77. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Ahh a word from the Nutty Professor, Hold the responses, no more time for you, we’re done, just politely go away.
    ___________________________________________

    professorloumiamidolphinsblog says:
    November 30, 2018 at 11:06 am
    Stick up for a worthless qb and diss a guy who is underutilized because that worthless qb can’t see the field

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      ORob — you don’t get to speak for the board. Way I see it he is head of the grave yard shift. And nice to have the board get going then while most of us sleep. But bottom line is none of us have to read or respond to any given post.

      • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

        I’m not speaking for the board, just myself, if the moron can’t hold a reasonable convo without throwing insults i have no desire to carry on a convo with him.

        I want him to go away from my posts.

        But thanks for asking.,

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        My bad — by “we’re done” you meant you and him. And that played right into my don’t have to read or respond to any post comment. Good for you man. Just sorry misunderstood.

  78. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Stills later tried to clarify his remarks by saying he wasn’t criticizing Brock Osweiler or Ryan Tannehill,
    _________________________________

    Maybe he should man up and disclose who he was actually throwing under the bus?

    if it wasn’t the QBs there’s only one guy left and that would be Gase.

    I like the way he did the MJ moonwalk after he made those comments.

  79. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Mike E. says:
    November 30, 2018 at 1:02 pm
    Stanger – I’m not worried about it, but to say that Tannehill is here no matter what because of the $13M cap hit doesn’t make sense to me. You still have $13M to work with, and if you can find someone better or as good for less, why not?
    ___________________________________________

    how much will you actually save? at 13 mil you’re breaking even, could we get a guy for 9 mil and save a whopping 4 mil? will that guy have a 97.2 passer rating?

    and please don’t say Fitzpatrick!

  80. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    I suspect you’ll see another three year deal for Tannehill, I’m thinking a 20 mil signing bonus to trim his cap hit.

  81. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Stills went back into the media room to say he wasn’t knocking the QBs and that it’s not about one specific thing with the offense.

    But here’s the thing, Stills did have better numbers before Tannehill went down and then he got banged up. Osweiler is the one who didn’t get him the ball, and then it continued last week with Tannehill back. But that’s one game.

    • BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

      Tim, you’re right and I think that had a lot to do with us having Wilson and Grant. Teams had to focus/worry about them making things easier for Stills.

      • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

        I understand what Gase has been trying to do on offense. All that quick stuff and really quick guys running around have to be accounted for, or you get those explosive plays. That brings guys focusing up front then you start hitting them deep.
        However it has not worked out. Saw glimpses early in the year, but that was short lived.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        I agree. When we had all of our WRs healthy we were a better team. They all complemented each other.

      • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

        Now its all the offense can do. Looks like hes got no confidence in them, but will never say it.

  82. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    ER, exactly! Then the OL started to come apart and deep drops became an issue. When Osweiler took deeper drops he got sacked a lot because we couldn’t block it long enough.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I also think this is what Stills was referring to but he didn’t want throw the OL under the bus either.

      • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

        I saw @ the GB game, Stills wide open a few times. Brock never saw. And I mean wide open like we see against us every week but never see our guys getting that huge separation.

    • ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

      LOL
      They are all idiots in this video. Got Hunt’s guys pushing all women and the women keep coming back for more. Seems they kept escalating the situation….call the frickin cops and let them handle it.

      That said how stupid is Hunt? Go to your room, call the cops if need be. Cant do that to women….trash. Gotta know to walk away, no matter what.

  83. D's avatar D says:

    BailBondMike says:
    November 30, 2018 at 11:42 am

    D, come on man. I agree with a lot of what you say and like your input on players and I agree that Tannehill is an average starting QB. But, come on man, Bortles is better than Tannehill? I have to disagree on that one.

    I didnt say Bortles was a better QB than Tanny, i said he has better QB tools. Neither are any good, Bortles has a higher ceiling, but he hasnt reached it so thats why i said i didnt want Bortles or Winston here.

    • BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

      I got ya, and agree. Bortles just needs a better arm. Some of Bortles INT’s aren’t bad decisions, it’s just that the ball doesn’t get there at the right time.

  84. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I know it’s sick, but I can’t watch that video, I might cry. My hopes for a FF championship just went down the drain.

  85. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I tried to grab Ware, but he’s gone. I did however put in a claim for Kerryon Johnson, the guy who picked up Ware dropped Johnson. I hope I get him, not a bad consolation when he’s healthy.

  86. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Mike, I’m battling my friend for our division title and a bye week in the playoffs and Kamara didn’t help me too much last night. Only 6 points. I didn’t see a 13-10 Dallas win coming. 😦

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      I had Michael Thomas last night, that was a killer. I’m already figuring I lost, I’m up against a really good team, that 9 points from MT hurt me bad. I was already a 20 point underdog as it was, now it’s about 41. Still, anything can happen, but I need Hunt to play this week, or I’m definitely going to lose.

  87. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    LMAO!!!

  88. BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

    I think part of Stills’ frustration is that he is getting open but in Gase’s dink and dunk offense he is not the first read. By the time the QB sees him, the open window has closed or the QB doesn’t have the time.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      That’s what I said earlier. We struggle to block the deeper drops where the QB needs at least 3 seconds because the receivers need time to get open deeper.

  89. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I don’t love the trade. It’s typical NY desperation to stir up interest for the short term. Kelenic is a blue chip prospect, for whatever that’s worth. He’s a highly regarded prospect, but he’s 19, and you never know. Bautista throws 100MPH, but has no control. Dunn the team had apparently soured on, so that one doesn’t bother me. Cano is likely to give us at best 1 or 2 good seasons, not great, and then fall off a cliff. Diaz is the real prize in the trade, because he’s a great closer, and he’s either 25 or 26, so he should be for a while. Seattle is reportedly going to may about $10M per season towards Cano’s contract, so that means the Mets will pay him $14M for the next 5 years. They dump the salaries of Bruce and Swarzak, so good in that regard. Still, to me it seems like a short-sighted move, short term gain, long term loss. If Kelenic turns into a great player, it’s a huge mistake. If Bautista learns control, it’s a mistake. I’d prefer to build a young team, not a fan of signing a 36 year old player, who will deteriorate quickly, they always do when they come to NY. I also have a feeling Cespedes won’t be back until late in the season if at all, so maybe that’s why they’re desperate for offense. Glad they won’t give up McNeil in the trade

  90. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    I’ll take RT17 over Bortles every day of the week.

  91. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    Mike E

    I am not going to look up stat’s!!!!!!
    Just start naming the best QB’s and see if he gets into the to 10???

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      If you’re talking about Russell Wilson he’s been top 10 and higher in passer rating every year he’s been in the league except for 2016.

  92. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    LOL @ SB

  93. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Tim – FWIW – A-Rod says it’s a great trade for the Mets. He says Cano is in excellent shape, he loves NY, can’t wait to come back, he’ll knock in 100 runs for the next 5 years, he doesn’t strike out, he’s not a HR or nothing guy, he knows how to hit to all fields with power, and that Cano will have a chip on his shoulder to prove to the mariners and Yankees that he can still produce

  94. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Wyo – Best QB’s according to what?

    • Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

      Your eyeballs Mr. optometrist!

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        Just a lowly optician sir, not an optometrist. So now we just let our eyes determine stuff? I don’t go solely by stats, but when I watch Russell Wilson play with that O-line leaking everywhere, he has fantastic pocket presence and elusiveness, and throws a real pretty ball. Plus, he can run to make things happen, but doesn’t look to do that first, always looks downfield. I think Rivers is a better pure passer, but Wilson is much better athlete that can beat you with more than just dropping back to pass. If you think Rivers is better, why hasn’t has team been to the playoffs a lot, and why didn’t he win playoff games? Rivers has been to the playoffs 5 years out 15, Wilson has been to the playoffs 5 of 7 years. Wilson is 8-4 in the playoffs, Rivers is 4-5. Rivers passer rating in the playoffs is 85.2, Wilson’s is 94.1. How is Philip Rivers better? Rivers had one of the best RB’s in the game in LT, and still couldn’t win games. Why?

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        The Chargers have gone through quite a few seasons where they weren’t very good. I think Rivers is good enough to win with.

  95. sb7mvp's avatar sb7mvp says:

    Rivers is a passer. Wilson is a quarterback.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      Wilson’s a football player. If they asked him to play defense, I bet he could, and probably better than some of the guys they have right now

  96. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    Wilson is bad ass. He is the best QB from that draft.

  97. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    Like I said before!
    I like Wilson for his Moxie!

    But if you add the 10 best QB’s he doesn’t make the list!

    Brady
    Rothliswhatever
    Rogers
    Bree’s
    Luck
    Rivers
    Mahomes
    Goff
    Fruiten Newton
    Watson ( I’ll give you this one)
    Staford??

    You picken up what I’m puttin down yet?????

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      I’m not touchin’ some of what you’re puttin’ down. Mahomes hasn’t even played a full season yet, Goff looks promising, but man does he have a heck of a team to play with. Cam Newton??? Lord, please! DeShaun Watson is incomplete like Mahomes. Stafford? Why? WTF has he ever done? Wilson has been the better QB over Luck over his entire career, more consistent. I’d concede Rodgers, Brees and Brady. Probably Roethlisberger too. I’d slot Wilson as #5

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I think Goff is more a product of being on a really good team. I’m not ready to put him up there yet. I would take Wilson over Stafford and Newton too.

Leave a reply to sb7mvp Cancel reply