Dolphins through the years: Who was your favorite Dolphins player of the 1970’s

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

430 Responses to Dolphins through the years: Who was your favorite Dolphins player of the 1970’s

  1. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    That’s easy for me. No one. I wasn’t a fan in the 70’s.

  2. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    naplesfan2010 says:
    June 27, 2019 at 8:56 am
    What if a team lost its DC 2 years in a row?
    Wouldn’t that disrupt the pipeline?

    What if a team lost its top 2 TEs
    AND
    its top 2 DEs
    AND its top 3 OTs? THREE tackles in a league where the OTs are crucial
    and on a team which must protect a 40+ yr-old QB !!!!!

    What if a team also lost 2 of its top WRs
    AND its entire QB coaching staff?

    AND 2 of the 4 defensive postion coaches
    in ADDITION to losing its DC?

    Throw in losing rotational starter quality at CB and DT.

    I just think this is MASSIVE.

    Reply

    If it was another team other than the Patsies I would agree. With them? Not so much. They have been cycling players through that system for years and not missing a beat. (coaches too, they have been a favorite poaching ground for coaches too)

  3. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    As far as best player at position #66 in the last one might be the best of all. Larry Little rocked.

  4. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  5. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    Larry Csonka

  6. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  7. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  8. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Naples – I have to agree with Rock on that one. Until proven otherwise, there’s no reason to doubt that Belichick can handle losing DC’s, OC’s, both, and players too other than TB12. They didn’t miss a beat when Matt Patricia left, so no reason to expect any different with Brian Flores leaving.

  9. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

  10. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Stanger – I’ll do the 80’s next week

  11. Wyoming85's avatar wyoming85 says:

    Was going to say Jim “Crash” Jensen! 🙂

    But he didn’t start until 1981!

  12. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Csonka was my favorite. I loved that he just ran people over, carried people, dragged them, whatever he had to do to move ahead. I was too young to appreciate Jim Langer, Larry Little, Dick Anderson, Jake Scott etc . . .

  13. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    MIke E — loved Csonka, but the day he, Warfield and Kiick went to the WFL was like betraying me. Know we are used to stuff like that now, but for young me was like the day the music died and they meant for it to.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      Yeah, that blew for sure. That was very rare for that era, players stayed with their teams forever because there was no free agency

  14. CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

    Favorite 70’s player:
    Michael Lionel “Mike” Howell
    Most underrated Dolphins player ever. No way we stay undefeated in ’72 without good ol’ “Mike”.

    Also has to top the lists of best nickname ever. With garishly pompous nicknames such as Terry “The Blonde Bomber” Bradshaw and Jack “The Assassin” Tatum going around, you have to appreciate the simple sturdiness of a sobriquet like Michael Lionel “Mike” Howell.

    When remembering Dolphins domination in the 70s, always remember “Mike”.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      No way we win that game w/o Mike

      • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

        He may not have the notoriety, or the stats, or games started, or games played, or even time on the team. But his locker room presence, once he joined the Fins, can never be understated. A true unsung hero for the Miami Dolphins.

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        I can’t argue that Kong

      • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

        I don’t think it needs to be said, as I’m pretty sure you get my humor, but just in case; I’m not making fun of your name, but rather the fact when you google this guy it comes up as Michael Lionel “Mike” Howell. Kinda reminds me of this south park episode:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhHJ1Ns0h2E

  15. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    Mercury Morris

  16. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Kong – I got ya man. I had to look him up in pro-football-reference.com. I figured it was a funny, but I wanted to see if he was a real player or not. 🙂

  17. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I think as a kid, it was also fun to the say the name Csonka. Sounds like a football player name

    • D's avatar D says:

      You werent a kid…. ever.

      But i do agree with you that if i had to pick a that era player (which i wasn’t around to see), Csonka was my favorite because he was the epitome of football. Reckless abandon, out manning the other player, not a finesse player but just brutish and bullish. I got to play fullback occasionally and i can remember visualizing him and his style of get low, make contact, stand the defender up, and drive through them.

  18. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Pigskin was my favorite

  19. TryPod's avatar TryPod says:

    Paul Warfield.

  20. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Anyone notice that Griese’s helmet shape is weird? Is it a one-off?

  21. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    My Dumb ass brother locked his keys in his work truck and had to call AAA. The AAA guy gets there and proceeded to lock HIS keys in his truck so they both had to wait until another AAA guy could get there to unlock both trucks…..

  22. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Griese’s helmet reminds me of the ones you used to get in the machines by the gumball machines. I used to have a lot of those, lost them over the years.

  23. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    Mike E as a Baby

  24. ElephantRider's avatar ElephantRider says:

    Born in 74. Football didn’t come to me until the 80s. Having watched tons of the oldies…..

    Csonka

  25. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    I hear this guy was pretty good

    • Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

      only for the first couple of years, after that not so much… He couldn’t get it done with the best QB of all time.

      • Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

        His loyalty to Tom Olivadotti spoiled any chances of winning in the 80’s & 90’s

      • The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

        He was still a very good coach

        We were in the post season a lot

        Remember this days

        (Piggy sighs)

  26. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Piggy – I specified Dolphins player. If I hadn’t, I have a feeling there would be quite a few votes for Shula

  27. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Lol Rock 🤣

    Mike E as Benjamin Button.

  28. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Hard to pick just one so I’d say Csonka, Morris and Warfield.

  29. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Favorite player of the 70s, Por Fador. Anyone know what I’m talking about?

  30. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Csonka, Met him once in 1970

  31. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Leave it to Rock to piss in our cornflakes!

  32. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    The biggest mistake Shula made was attaching himself to Marino and the offense almost exclusively and ignoring the defense. It wasn’t just about sticking with Olivadotti too long, but defensive players getting up there in age and no longer being top shelf defenders – The Killer B’s.

  33. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    i disagree Timmy, it was the lack of a running game that made winning a title in the 80’s so difficult, no ball control just slinging it, the D was on the field too long, the way we won in miami was with csonka and a ball controlled offense which made the defense look very good.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Disagree Robby baby, that offense could score often but the defense couldn’t stop a damn thing. The defense was old and slow and not good.

  34. son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

    Csonka was/is my favorite but Manny Fernandez is way up there too.
    Kiick was always a top favorite as well.

  35. CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

    The first football game I ever watched was the Dolphins-Niners Super Bowl, so I don’t have a favorite 70s player, except for Michael Lionel “Mike” Howell of course.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      That game showed every leak in our defense at that point. Besides not being able to block the 49ers defense either.

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        We had no answer for their offense or their defense. They were getting to Marino almost every pass play

      • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

        I was about 8 or 9 and didn’t know football, so I wasn’t able to evaluate it on that level.

        I believe my analysis of the game was “Oooh, they have Dolphins, I like that team”.

  36. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    LOL @ Tim!

  37. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I was up in VT for that superbowl. I was so drunk by the end I was barely able to stand up.

  38. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Rob – If only the Dolphins had Kenyan Drake back then. 😉

  39. The Flying Pig's avatar The Flying Pig says:

    Mike E. says:
    June 27, 2019 at 3:28 pm (Edit)
    Piggy – I specified Dolphins player. If I hadn’t, I have a feeling there would be quite a few votes for Shula

    *****

    So I can’t pick the coach or the pigskin?
    What kind of mean game is this?

    Okay here’s my new choice
    The Orange Bowl

  40. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Tim – If I was in normal Mets fan mode I would have thrown a shit-fit about today’s loss but I’ve become numb to it. I expected when they took the 3-1 lead. As soon as Diaz walked the 1st batter I knew it was trouble

  41. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    Ol @ ORob. If you’re going to be stuck in a decade the 80’s is a good one.

  42. Krishna's avatar Krishna says:

    I loved Csonka…guaranteed 4 yards every carry and Warfield on O; Manny and Jake and Nick on D.

    I can’t pick a favorite….lol.

  43. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    I didn’t know the guys like you guys did. Living in NY it was much harder to get info on players and such back then, and I only saw them on TV when they played the Jets.

    • son of a son of a shula's avatar son of a son of a shula says:

      Football cards
      Sports Illustrated
      Sport
      Sporting News
      Local paper
      About all there was, in Ct I faced the same issues as you did

  44. Krishna's avatar Krishna says:

    If Orob is old enough to have watched Csonka in the OB, I’m pretty sure he had wet dreams back then…..all in fun orob! 😉

    • ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

      i use to pretend i was csonka on my way to school, of course it was in slo-mo…busting thru the line galloping to the end zone… the neighbors thought i was touched!

  45. Krishna's avatar Krishna says:

    When they did sweeps with a true FB that was going to take you out running full steam (and that was very slow) clearing a path for Morris (who needed to learn patience) and LL, Langer, and Kooch pulling, just a thing of beauty getting around the edge.

  46. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    I’ll just leave this here

    Tom Olividatti

  47. Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

    It is, without logical argument, the fault of the piss poor defensive scheme, ignoring aging D players and Olividatti’s inability to even slow down Marv Levi’s offense that cost us the Marino years. 56-55 type scores

  48. Krishna's avatar Krishna says:

    But that was the 80s.

    • Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

      my blossoming of fanhood. I was born in 69 and went to my first game was when we beat the Bills in December of 81. I wasn’t really a fan or even aware of the Dolphins before that game.

      We just lost to the Chargers that year in the playoffs

      The next year was the players strike so, with the backlash I didn’t get back into it until they drafted this curly haired coke head a year or so later.

      • Rockphin's avatar Rockphin says:

        (my Dad was really pissed off by the strike so no NFL on HIS TV that season

        My old man was a Giants fan

  49. olddolphan's avatar olddolphan says:

    ONE OF THE MANY GREAT things about the Dolphins of the early ’70’s was the fact that, on any given Sunday, almost any one of them could be the star of the day. This would certainly change during the Dan Marino era but, from 1970 through 1974, the Dolphins really were a TEAM of studs and stars. MY VOTE for my favorite player had to go to ZONK! He was the constant, consummate, brute fullback who could be counted on in key situations o get that first down and keep the drive alive.
    WHAT A PLEASURE it was to be a season ticket holder during the glory years of this franchise!! –Their 32-2 record during the ’72 and ’73 seasons is a record that no other franchise will ever top!!
    ——-
    On photo #9, that young Dolphins QB is none other than George Mira starting his one and only start in 1971 against our favorite patsies of the ’70’s, the BUFFALO BILLS!! George was an alum of “THE U” long before it was known as “THE U!” In his senior season at Miami, Mira and his Hurricanes were picked to win the National Championship by Playboy Magazine. They finished 3-7!! But they WOULD get better over time, as would the Dolphins!

    Y’all have a great evening!!

  50. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    Mike E. says:
    June 27, 2019 at 6:06 pm
    Nah, Smith isn’t anything like Drake. Really . .
    ____________________________________
    what they have in common is they both suck

  51. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Sonny – In my childhood football took a back seat to baseball. I was consumed with baseball as a kid. I didn’t really get interested in football in earnest until the late 70’s when we were fighting the Colts for division titles.

  52. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    With an asterisk
    Earl Morrall was my fave 70s player.

  53. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    10:30 Tee time Ocala National skins game, see ya later.

  54. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    If i may return please to what I posted at the end of the last blog,
    concerning NE’s losses since last season.

    It would be naive to write off a Bellichick-Brady team,
    as their recovery from previous losses is legendary yet factual,
    but this year IS different for several reasons.

    They lost their second DC in two years,
    and their two main defensive position coaches as well,
    so there is no team-trained guy in the pipeline, no “next man up”
    and to prove that, there is no replacement being named.

    Instead, the oldest coach in the league says he will just work more hours,
    but even though he is smart and competent, the 24-hour day is finite.
    Those DC hours in the film room must be taken from HC hours.
    Billy must now interact first hand with every defensive player,
    with no one to filter or shield him from personality conflicts
    with guys young enough to be his grandchildren.

    He himself must deliver the Patriot Way in every one of
    those focused interactions on the practice field.

    This might prove to be exhausting and imperfect,
    which is especially important to a team where perfection is
    expected and necessary for their plans to work and overcome personnel issues.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      They had hired Greg Schiano, he took the job, and then he left the job. They may make a similar hire before the season starts. Even if they don’t, it’s hard to doubt Belichick getting it done

      • naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

        another example of the wheels flying off

        All of Billy’s plans are blowing up in his face.

  55. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    Also
    We here in Miami are seeing our team picked to finish last or only win 5 games
    because we lost our 2 top DEs and our 2nd best OT.

    The patsies lost their best THREE OTs and both their top DEs.
    And one of the replacement tackles they brought in retired after like 3 days.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      We also traded our starting QB, and replaced him with one QB who was 2-5 last season and another who was 3-10

  56. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    ALSO
    piling loss on top of loss

    Brady has depended on Gronk. No one can deny that.
    No Gronk this year.
    And all THREE replacements have become epic fails.
    AND Gronk’s back-up
    or running mate as a premier blocking TE in the league
    is also gone.

    Again, if the pat way is “next man up” … Who is that???
    a third stringer you cannot even name.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      I thought Ben Watson came back to the Pats this year. Not that he’s a shell of Gronk, or maybe not even a shell of his former self, but he was pretty good for NO

      • naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

        He’s suspended for the first 4 games (including the game in Miami),
        and he was retired from football after FIFTEEN years
        when Billy begged him to come back out of desperation.

  57. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    NE’s QB is over 40 and who is their back-up?
    a mediocre journeyman, not some young star being groomed

  58. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    I would like to point out that our QBs have NEVER lost a Super Bowl,
    while NE’s QB has lost THREE Super Bowls.

    3 strikes and you’re out, bro.

  59. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    One last thing is that Brady has lost his QB coach and assistant QB coach
    who have been with him for more than a decade.

    Who are the replacements? Billy is stretched pretty thin with picking up DC duties.

    Will Brady mesh with the new guys? Will he need to train them in his way?
    Will they try to change him to their way? Is Brady flexible?
    No Gronk, no Amendola, no 7-11 to depend on being there.

    • steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

      Minkah should’ve been #1 on that list, he’s more valuable to us, because of his flexibility. You’ll see how a real coach uses him this year.

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        Flexibility is great as long as you’re playing well in each spot. That wasn’t the case last year, so let’s hope we use him in spots where he’s more likely to succeed

  60. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    You should be right Naples, and I agree this year is different, but I’ve played that game too many times, to fall for it again. So a big ole OD show me is the best I can do.

  61. steveccnv's avatar steveccnv says:

    Mike, Czonka was Mr. Por Fador. It’s from a commercial he did years ago, after his playing days.

  62. manitobafinfan's avatar manitobafinfan says:

    I grew up cheering for Names like Don Jonas, Mack Herron, and watching Record setters like George Reed << O Rob would have loved this guy… and Ron Lancaster.. did not have Cable TV until early 80's, and our networks never broadcast NFL games until the playoffs.. so based on 70's playoffs I only had limited viewage , but would be Csonka, Morris and Griese..

  63. Krishna's avatar Krishna says:

    Naples, I’ve been looking/more wondering about the hit Pat’s took this year, too. Every year, I look for the inevitable to be sooner rather than later.

    This year might be different. Good job on the research. Belichick cannot do this alone but can is the system greater than him or a function of him. I say the system is greater than him and might not be repairable. Too
    many broken parts than have not been replaced with similar quality.

  64. Krishna's avatar Krishna says:

    …delete “can”

  65. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Krishna – He’s got a lot on his plate (Belichick), but man, until he proves he can’t handle it, I see no reason to get excited about their demise. I feel like every few years we do things like this, and then at the end of the season, they’re somewhere between 10-6 and 13-3. Maybe this year is different but truth be told, I don’t want it to be just this year, I want a decade long swoon.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Agreed, until they finally fall then I’ll believe it. If they’re lacking in some areas they’ll change how they play and win in another way. We’ve seen it so many times.

  66. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    All booked for the Fest! Looking forward to it, but not rushing away the summer!

    • manitobafinfan's avatar manitobafinfan says:

      DILLY DILLY !!

      • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

        Trying to get my boys to come too but my son feels guilty taking off from work because he’s on a project. I told him he’s a good kid, but take your vacation and enjoy it!

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      What day you getting in? Goes for Toba too.

      • manitobafinfan's avatar manitobafinfan says:

        pretty sure Wednesday ..

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        Wed dinner is something to think about. Trying to keep Thurs as rest time though. Man does that weekend tire this old man out. Normally we only have 2 party days a week in us these days.

      • manitobafinfan's avatar manitobafinfan says:

        yep we will talk when closer , always nice to share yer company sir.. maybe even the MRS…

  67. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Mike, I still have a gut feeling that Minkah is going to be a special player. Not just because he’s on the Dolphins, I would say the same thing if he was on another team. I believed that about him before he was drafted. He could become the key player in our defense moving forward because he’s so versatile. Not just in coverage but he can also attack the LOS. We might see him do more blitzing in this new defense.

    • Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

      I think he can too. I just don’t think he was anything special last year, except for the fact that he handled a lot of different responsibilities. He was good to very good at some, and average or below average on others.

      • D's avatar D says:

        I think he handled the transitions he was faced with in his first NFL season extremely well and showed why he was a first rounder. Some of the plays he made we nothing short of perennial pro-bowler stuff. There were times when he got jostled around on the defense, as far as what positions they had him shift around to where he he got burned, but then again all rookies do.

        I dont think many of the other rookies came into a team and especially a defense that was as big of a mess as ours was. Still he was one of the few highlights on our D. I think if he finally is on a D he is able to find his groove in, you will see some pretty remarkable leaps forward.

  68. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Stanger/Toba – We get in on Wednesday

  69. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    FEST — October 13 versus the Redskins

    Fest is the Skins game on Oct 13. Pretty good seats for just $55 per and we have the box back or at least a group together.

    Sec 320 (like the 30)
    Row 8 – Seats 10-19
    Row 9 – Seats 10-19
    Row 10 – Seats 5-14

    Pure fun Groundhog’s Day. Tunes with the Dog on Friday, Dave & Buster’s Sat Nite, and a Chef Warren cooked tailgate.

    IN
    Hulk
    Mike E (+1-3) (flight done)
    Pig
    Doggy (+2)
    Son (+3 – ?) — got a number on that?
    stanger (+4)
    OD
    Toba (+1) (flight done)
    Phelon (+2) (own seats)
    Rock

    POSSIBLE
    Brian NY (+1?)
    Twice
    Naples (+1)

    Possibles make yourself a definite (no payment for a bit but need a number). And time for the rest of you “INs” to get your flight reservations (will be cheaper) and hotel books (just ask if you need help). Plenty of seats for those not in before too.

  70. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    D, I agree on Minkah. He’s instinctive, competitive, student of the game, a very good tackler and he can make plays on the ball. I see him as a guy who will get better and better every year.

  71. BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

    Phelon, The ice cap has expanded in Antarctica and scientists can’t figure it out because global temps have risen. Look no further than the aliens and their underground base in the Antarctic. They must be manipulating the winds to help maintain the consistency or expand the ice cap. My guess is they are doing some renovations and/or expanding their underground base and don’t want to be exposed. 😉

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I believe in aliens. In this massive universe and “time” there is no way only we live on a planet of life. There may be millions of earth type life but different too.

  72. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Mike, at nickel back wasn’t Minkah one of the highest rated players at the position? He did excel in some areas but was also stretched thin at times. Communication was a big problem with our entire defense in recent years – that’s been an issue since Gase with Vance Johnson and Matt Burke. It didn’t work. A HC that avoids one area of the team doesn’t work. I think Flores will be a more hands on HC with the entire team. Let’s hope he’s the right choice. So far so good.

  73. Phindog's avatar Phindog says:

    Nickel Back are Fags man 🐕🥃🥃😎🎼🖕

  74. pheloniusphish's avatar pheloniusphish says:

    BBM – Those damn aliens are making ice for drinks. Probably putting ice in their whiskey.

  75. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Did you ever think, hey maybe someone just like us is wondering if we’re out there too?

    • manitobafinfan's avatar manitobafinfan says:

      Nope , I think they know where we are already .. just trying to decide if we are worthy of meeting them , or should be eradicated by them 🤔🤯👽

  76. bookman11's avatar bookman11 says:

    God created Earth and that is it. No proof of anything else, and never will be.

    • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

      It was pretty awesome of God to make this unbelievably, inconceivably enormous universe just for us. Clearly we’re extremely important. At least we know we got plenty of space to store our shit once we ruin the fuck out of this world, so that’s comforting to know. 😉

    • TryPod's avatar TryPod says:

      The “universe” never created one of anything. That in-and-of-itself should make you think it is extremely unlikely we are a singular instance in the entirety of the cosmos.. or that there is only one omnipresent entity.

  77. Mike E.'s avatar Mike E. says:

    Bookman – Why did God create the New England Patriots?

  78. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    who will win the starting positions?
    Fitz or Rosen?
    Gaskin, Ballage or Drake?

  79. BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

    Phelon, Scientists in Antarctica did discover some ancient hieroglyphs but it turned out to be a prank left by some Spanish explorers. It read “whisky en las rocas”. LOL

  80. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    our “god” has long died, it was a giant star that exploded 5 billion years ago and emitted dust and gas that formed our sun and the planets that orbit it, we have all the elements created from that star so what we are is stardust.

    • BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

      My wife believes I was created from hot gas since I constantly emanate it. She bought me a bottle of Beano last year. It’s still in the cabinet unopened. I like to fart. It makes most people (I know) laugh.

    • BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

      Nothing like busting one on a buddies back swing!

  81. BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

    Just being sarcastic about aliens. I am a huge believer. I watch all the shows, “Ancient Aliens”, “UFO’s: The Lost Evidence”, “UFO’s Declassified”, and my new favorite that has provided real interesting video evidence and testimony – “Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation”. “Strange Evidence” is an interesting show also.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Same here. The Ancient Aliens show is the most telling. How did civilizations thousands of miles from each other and thousands of years ago all build the same type of pyramids and structures pointing to the same constellations with similar sculptures of alien beings?

  82. ocalarob's avatar ocalarob says:

    There are other life forms out there it’s a mathematical certainty, the form they take would have a lot to do with their environment, but we will never see them, space is just too vast.

    if we wanted to travel to the nearest star to us and we could travel 67 million miles per hour, it would take 40 years, that’s only 4 light years away and there’s nothing there that could suit us.

    the closest start system that could support life is 40 light years away Trappist 1, it would take 400 years to get there at 67 million miles per hour.

    so any of you looking for Aliens in the night sky i wouldn’t worry too much in finding them.

    • BailBondMike's avatar BailBondMike says:

      They are already here. We could be a species of them, IMO.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        I’m pretty much with ORob on this one. Might be a lot of life out there, might even be intelligent life, but not life that could hit this planet except maybe in the send out some probes and seed life kind of way.

        But what do I know? Maybe Einstein was wrong and the Millennium Falcon did make the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs. 🙂

    • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

      Not only is space too vast, but time is too long. The universe is nearly 14 billion years old (by best estimates). We have been cognizant for a few thousand years, and capable of looking for life beyond our solar system for 75 years or so. It’s estimated the oldest parts of our universe started forming planets in the neighborhood of 12 billion years ago.

      So for us to discover intelligent life outside out solar system and make contact, not only would we have to locate alien life in the ridiculous immensity of space, we would also have to have the extraordinary fortune to exist in the same time frame as that life, that frame being a few thousand years out of billions.

  83. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    Mike E
    Thanks for the great oldies pix.
    Great Gallery.

  84. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    I don’t believe in other planets being inhabited by life forms.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      I believe it’s impossible that there aren’t other life forms in the universe.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Do you mean no life on other planets or just that the life forms couldn’t get to ours? Find it hard to believe that in all those galaxies couldn’t be some life. Intelligent life not so sure of.

      • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

        A 100 billion galaxies that we know of right now, each galaxy with 200-300 billion stars. To believe it’s all made just for us is the epitome of human arrogance IMO. Mathematically there must be other life at some point, in some place.

        Even if you subscribe to an earthly religion and a God of man, I’ve always considered, perhaps this entity created the universe so that no intelligent life would be able to interact or contact each other, hence the vastness of space and time.

      • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

        This was not meant to be a reply.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        But yet it was a reply, even agreement. Only way no other life is the “divine spark” theory. But only talking microbial on that.

  85. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    Unless somewhere else some methane, ammonia, and water got hit by lightning and evolved into SI models.
    That I would accept.
    (Hopefully girls on those planets are not so mean as ours.)

  86. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Think about all the different life forms on our planet both in the sea and land. The problem is we humans tend to think about aliens as little green men and space ships. Other life forms do not necessarily have to resemble anything we’re aware of. But our planet alone has such a vast assortment of life that it should open your mind about the possibilities.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Yep — we keep finding life here were didn’t expect it. Like around lava vents at the bottom of the ocean floor.

  87. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    This conversation is why it’s difficult to accept the idea of a God entity as many believe. Any God would be just another life form. We humans are already creating life and manipulating it. What if another species that’s been around millions (or whatever) of years before us were evolving and advancing as we are? Remember motor vehicles, planes and rockets etc. are only in existence for a hundred plus years and that’s just a small blip on the screen on time.

    • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

      It’s interesting, the consideration of God as just another life form. If so, would that by definition just be alien life. Unless this other life form is able to somehow step outside the natural bounds of this universe. Of course that just makes it a multi-dimensional alien, lol.

      I’ve often wondered if there is a ‘God’ if it is actually closer in description to a natural force such as gravity, nuclear force, or even space/time itself.

      • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

        That’s kind of what I was saying. God surely isn’t a man with white hair and beard wearing a robe. Oh right, that’s what wise men looked like thousands of years ago or even today. LOL

  88. CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

    Stang,

    For me, the “divine spark” has always been a seemingly unnecessary ingredient to the creation theory. We have a universe of immutable natural processes. God could easily create us through these processes. But yes, if there was a “divine spark”, you can discount the mathematical certainty of other life.

    Unfortunately this is where the conversation always breaks down as irreducible. You can’t really factor beyond math/science vs belief/leap of faith.

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      I don’t buy it either Kong. But then if it is needed can’t say it is not either. Only way to disprove is find other life.

  89. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Kong, I agree with your view on this. We humans say God created us in his image. I think it’s quite clear that it’s the other way around. Everything points to that being the case.

  90. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    Aren’t we just germs in the bloodstream of a large host being? Like she thinks of us as a cancer or virus or the proteins she is working on to get abs.
    Or is she no more aware of us than we are of the microbes in our gut.
    Maybe that is the Theory of Relativity.
    We are gut microbes in the gut of a large being who is a gut microbe in the gut of a huge being who is a gut microbe in a giant, and gut microbes are in our gut and gut microbes are in the gut of our gut microbes, which have gut microbes in theirs.etc ad infinitum both ways.

    • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

      I’ve always enjoyed this idea, being smaller parts of a larger whole, and this expanding inward and outward in perpetuity. Each individual piece also making up the entirety of the whole.

      It’s a fractal concept that appeals to my sense of symmetry. When you look at certain system formations on a macro and micro scale, such as the atom and the solar system, you find this symmetry. It might be coincidental, but I love the idea of infinite fractal existence, lol.

  91. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    God was described as the unmoved first mover. I think that is naive and a cop-out.
    In time, what came before the first thing? At what moment was there zero after which in the next moment there was something?
    In space, what is outside the universe? If the universe is a thing, what is its husk or capsule or “skin”? OK, so what is just outside that?

  92. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    I think holes are the answer.

  93. stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

    Read an article years ago which brought up an interesting point. The earth has been putting out an electromagnetic signal for a century now. Talking radio, TV…. heck even purposefully with SETI.

    Been way to short for our stuff to hit other planets, but our detection is good enough that would have caught similar from other worlds even if from millions of years in the past. Lots of different theories on why not, but one is that when a civilization hits the level to put such out that it doesn’t have long to last because will also have ability to destroy itself.

    How’s that for the happy though of the day. 🙂

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      Stephen Hawking always said we may be better off not looking for alien life. Because in our own human history, advanced civilizations finding less advanced civilizations didn’t go so well for them.

      • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

        And that is true. But when it takes 4 million years for light to hit the closest star…… seems we don’t have much to worry about at this point at least.

  94. Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

    Hey, we should be thanking Jupiter, without that planet’s gravity keeping comets and asteroids from hitting earth we wouldn’t be here. Jupiter is two and a half times the size of all the planets in our solar system combined.

  95. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    You guys are right.
    It has been said, Stang, that we will not be able to define life until we discover life somewhere else.
    They say we only have one example of “life,” earthly life, and one sample of anything is considered too small to draw conclusions.
    What if you had seen only one movie or one rock or one dog or one romantic relationship?

    Could you imagine a giraffe if you had only ever seen a rat?

    So I am agreeing with you all that I just have no imagination. That’s why I cannot conceive of any other life anywhere.

    • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

      It’s so big, it technically doesn’t orbit the sun. It’s barycenter is a location something like 30,000 miles outside the surface of the sun, so technically the sun and Jupiter orbit this location.

      No planet orbits the exact center of the sun, but their barycenters are still located within it.

      • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

        LOL, I’m having reply problems today. This was supposed to be reply to Tim’s Jupiter comment (obviously).

    • stangerx's avatar stangerx says:

      Naples — but we have plenty examples of life on this planet. But for sure there could be other kinds. My guess is if those UFO’s have visited is cause of more of a Terminator kind of evolution. The time scales are just too beyond life.

  96. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    Of course I just reply that you are using your imagination to think that there are other life forms, and I believe people are smart enough to make up anything, even theories of other life forms, even where there is no basis of fact, such as imagining musical talent for Justin Bieber.

    • Tim Knight's avatar Tim Knight says:

      It’s not really imagination, it’s more scientific than that. Earth is tiny in the big scheme of things. To think that only this one tiny dot in the vast universe is the only dot with life is basically impossible mathematically. The Justin Beiber comment was funny though. LOL

  97. naplesfan2010's avatar naplesfan2010 says:

    Kong
    I love symmetry. Such a beautiful thing.

    And yet I also love chaos. Such a powerful thing.

    Yin and yang, symmetry and asymmetry, fractal order and nihilistic chaos.

    btw
    Fractal symmetry is the inverse of holes.

    Is DNA not defined as much by the spaces in its grid as the data on its matrix?
    They are just as certain and well ordered and necessary?

    I still think holes solves everything.

    • CavalierKong's avatar CavalierKong says:

      For true symmetry chaos must balance out the order, so I love the idea of chaos as well. The yin/yang is a great concept and metaphor for existence. Nihilistic chaos continually forming and creating the fractal symmetry of the universe, ever expanding.

Leave a reply to BailBondMike Cancel reply